News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The State of Linux Security by ancarda on Thursday December 22, 2016 @01:23PM (#13239195)
Out of interest, what does?
Re:The State of Linux Security by foofoo55 on Thursday December 22, 2016 @02:20PM (#13239585)
The almost-smallest devices are powered by LoopOS(tm):

  while(1){ }
Re:The State of Linux Security by emidln on Friday December 23, 2016 @11:00AM (#13245347)
So slow and bloated! Get with 2.0:

    for(;;){ }
Re:The State of Linux Security by emidln on Thursday December 22, 2016 @01:43PM (#13239345)
On the really low end, hardware is often single-purpose and you don't really need an operating system. When there is an operating system (maybe you have to listen to messages from something while performing a previously requested activity), a small hard real-time scheduling library gets used as an "operating system".
Re:The State of Linux Security by dmoy on Thursday December 22, 2016 @01:37PM (#13239303)
Just random RT OS's? It's been awhile since I've worked on tiny 8 bit mcus, but all the stuff was really small and seemingly hand rolled, nothing as monolithic as Linux.

I would not be surprised to learn that it varies from company to company and chip to chip, with various bits being shared for common logic.

Re:The State of Linux Security by Tempest1981 on Thursday December 22, 2016 @10:41PM (#13242651)
I remember VxWorks. Bigger than a while loop, but used in space missions back in the 90s: http://www.windriver.com/inspace/

Edit: looks like VxWorks wants a 32-bit CPU, 128KB of ROM, and 1-2MB of RAM. But you get threads, networking, filesystem, etc.

Re:The State of Linux Security by SEJeff on Thursday December 22, 2016 @03:41PM (#13240201)
Tron/Etron and variants most likely if any operating system at all. What powers non-smart refrigerators, dishwashers, washing machines, microwave ovents, etc? Tron for many of them.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRON_project

Re:The State of Linux Security by nickpsecurity on Thursday December 22, 2016 @02:34PM (#13239675)
As foofoo said, they often don't use OS's so much as libraries and loops. There are OS's that have been out there for a while for tiniest devices. Contiki is probably a nice intro to different tradeoffs they make in design and features:

http://www.contiki-os.org/

On more serious MCU's, you might see things like VxWorks or QNX:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VxWorks

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QNX

As hardware improved, we also saw trimmed down Linux like ucLinux, MontaVista Linux, and so on. It just went from there with increasing complexity (and reboots :).

Re:The State of Linux Security by pjc50 on Friday December 23, 2016 @08:36AM (#13244619)
Most of the really small stuff is written bare-metal in C or assembler. E.g. http://www.microchip.com/wwwproducts/en/PIC10F200 : 384 bytes of code space, 16 bytes of RAM. More constrained than the Atari 2600.

$0.31 each, available in 2mm x 3mm packages.

Re:The State of Linux Security by marcosdumay on Thursday December 22, 2016 @02:05PM (#13239505)
There are all kinds of micro-everything circulating out there, from timing and IO drivers to entire network stacks.