Re:Uber stops self-driving pilot in SF after DMV revokes its...
by Fricken on Thursday December 22, 2016 @01:21AM
(#13235305)
Uber has gotten it's way with a great deal of effort, and a world class legal team who are veterans by now at pushing around regulators. My theory may be incorrect, but I assure you, they've calculated their outs.
Tesla the company has a permit, individual Tesla users do not. If Uber had to get a $150 testing permit, well big deal. If every Tesla driver had to get a permit, that would be a meltdown for Tesla and Tesla owners.
Re:Uber stops self-driving pilot in SF after DMV revokes its...
by abduhl on Thursday December 22, 2016 @02:33AM
(#13235586)
I don't think this is true. The average Tesla costs what, $75000? $150 is 0.2% of the purchase price. People buying Teslas aren't people who are bothered by a $150 bar tab, let alone a $150 permit. In addition, many of them have emotional buy-in at this point (aka they have drank the Elon Kool-Aid) and driving a Tesla is as much a part of their identity as anything else. They won't be bothered by paying for a permit or having to go to the DMV to get one.
Re:Uber stops self-driving pilot in SF after DMV revokes its...
by guan on Thursday December 22, 2016 @06:23AM
(#13236551)
I believe Tesla charges at least $3,000 extra for self-driving Autopilot package. If it comes to it, they might be willing to just reimburse California residents the $150.
Re:Uber stops self-driving pilot in SF after DMV revokes its...
by user5994461 on Thursday December 22, 2016 @06:54PM
(#13241593)
I don't know how it works in the USA but I would expect people to register their cars and show a driving license while doing so.
And besides that, Tesla does have a permit, so that argument quickly becomes very messy and I don't see how it could rule in favor of Uber. If every driver needs the permit (as opposed to every corporation) , that applies to Uber as well. They'd effectively be making the legislation more onerous against themselves.