News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The Chevy Bolt Is the Ugly Car of the Near Future. Parent comment

Re:The Chevy Bolt Is the Ugly Car of the Near Future by RKoutnik on Monday December 19, 2016 @06:38PM (#13216003)
> And I suspect many Bolt owners want an economical car, not a luxury one, and the Bolt's got that in spades.

See my other reply in this subthread - Bolt/Model 3 will be equivalent in terms of price, so I don't see how the Bolt is more "economical".

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Chevy Bolt Is the Ugly Car of the Near Future by untog on Monday December 19, 2016 @06:42PM (#13216036)
Certainly possible, but the Model 3 isn't available yet and (according to link in the article) is predicted by some to not be available until 2018. So it's difficult to compare the buying choices for customers when one car can be bought and the other cannot.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Chevy Bolt Is the Ugly Car of the Near Future by tclAmockingbird on Monday December 19, 2016 @06:50PM (#13216084)
The federal tax rebate is likely to phase out over the course of the Model 3 introduction: it isn't a given that the effective pricing will be be similar. It's also premature to compare pricing without the Model 3 specifications.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Chevy Bolt Is the Ugly Car of the Near Future by cmrdporcupine on Monday December 19, 2016 @07:53PM (#13216427)
I can buy a Bolt nowish.

The Model 3 is still vaporware.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Chevy Bolt Is the Ugly Car of the Near Future by mikestew on Tuesday December 20, 2016 @12:28PM (#13221875)
Bolt/Model 3 will be equivalent in terms of price

It's an old, yellowed page out of the Microsoft book: "what we have in the pipeline is better than what you can buy today!"

We know nothing of the as-yet-unshipped Model 3. Let's hold off on those side-by-side comparisons. Because if you want to compare, we should weight the "can buy today" column quite heavily.

[ Parent | on HN ]