Re:Moody's: U.S. Telecoms are underinvesting in broadband
by CalRobert on Friday December 16, 2016 @06:32AM
(#13192544)
Considering the population of New Zealand, that's a bill of around $255 per person. Perhaps they think the money could have been better spent?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Moody's: U.S. Telecoms are underinvesting in broadband
by theandrewbailey on Friday December 16, 2016 @09:09AM
(#13193293)
$255 sounds extremely reasonable. That's much less than what most people pay annually for service.
Re:Moody's: U.S. Telecoms are underinvesting in broadband
by orclev on Friday December 16, 2016 @10:21AM
(#13193818)
I would happily pay a one time cost of $255 to run fiber to my house. I'd even be willing to pay $500 to run fiber to my house. Sadly around here if I want fiber to my house, even assuming I could find an ISP willing to run it, it would probably cost me upwards of $2000 to have it run, and probably significantly more than that. That's also not counting the cost of actually getting service, that's just the "installation fee" to have it run.
Re:Moody's: U.S. Telecoms are underinvesting in broadband
by rubber_duck on Friday December 16, 2016 @10:43AM
(#13193990)
He said per person, not per household - not the same unless you're living alone. Also this doesn't make your internet free you have to pay for the service on top of that.
And believe it or not a lot of people don't care about having fiber internet available.
Re:Moody's: U.S. Telecoms are underinvesting in broadband
by theandrewbailey on Friday December 16, 2016 @12:20PM
(#13194867)
Once installed, fiber optic lines become long term infrastructure, and will be used for decades. With those time scales in mind, the line installation cost is reasonable even after accounting for market penetration and occupancy rates.
Re:Moody's: U.S. Telecoms are underinvesting in broadband
by dmix on Friday December 16, 2016 @10:40AM
(#13193969)
But only a quarter of the people who have access are using the service so far.
> with fibre available to 1,006,741 users, of which 240,525 have signed up
And the goal is to cover 75% of the population (1,340,000 households).
So it's around $1000/household. And of those households the majority will not be using the service but they'll be paying for it assuming the household pays taxes.