Re:Confirmation of the topology of the Wendelstein 7-X stell...
by mozumder on Sunday December 11, 2016 @03:20AM
(#13150141)
How small can these stellarators get? Is there a necessary minimum strength magnetic field that basically creates a minimum size for a stellarator?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Confirmation of the topology of the Wendelstein 7-X stell...
by raverbashing on Sunday December 11, 2016 @03:57AM
(#13150236)
I'd say the smaller the Stellerator is, the stronger the magnetic fields have to be, as the curve radiuses are smaller
So there's probably an ideal size
Re:Confirmation of the topology of the Wendelstein 7-X stell...
by krashnburn200 on Sunday December 11, 2016 @05:32AM
(#13150474)
my math suggests something approximating the size of a star could achieve fusion by using only gravity for containment.
I wouldn't want to stand too close to that sucker though.
Re:Confirmation of the topology of the Wendelstein 7-X stell...
by pavlov on Sunday December 11, 2016 @06:36AM
(#13150634)
If someone had built such an object, say 10,000 light years away, what would it look like to us?
Re:Confirmation of the topology of the Wendelstein 7-X stell...
by krashnburn200 on Sunday December 11, 2016 @11:58PM
(#13155651)
nothing for 10,000 years - however long ago they built it.
Re:Confirmation of the topology of the Wendelstein 7-X stell...
by analognoise on Sunday December 11, 2016 @08:21AM
(#13150952)
I read this as such dry humor, I have to ask if you are English.
Re:Confirmation of the topology of the Wendelstein 7-X stell...
by krashnburn200 on Sunday December 11, 2016 @09:24AM
(#13151171)
Texan
Re:Confirmation of the topology of the Wendelstein 7-X stell...
by k__ on Sunday December 11, 2016 @06:45AM
(#13150660)
but aren't stars varying extremely in size?
Re:Confirmation of the topology of the Wendelstein 7-X stell...
by wolrah on Sunday December 11, 2016 @11:18AM
(#13151675)
> but aren't stars varying extremely in size?
Woosh.
A star is a fusion reactor using only gravity for containment.
Re:Confirmation of the topology of the Wendelstein 7-X stell...
by photogrammetry on Sunday December 11, 2016 @03:42PM
(#13153075)
Well, they're only just barely contained. Things spew out radiation like nobody's business.