News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Traceur – A JavaScript.next-to-JavaScript-of-today compiler by davedunkin on Saturday December 10, 2016 @09:58AM (#13145891)
There are only 4 commits since the last release 6 months ago, and most of the commits are from two authors. This doesn't look like a healthy active project.
Re:Traceur – A JavaScript.next-to-JavaScript-of-today compiler by nojvek on Saturday December 10, 2016 @11:10AM (#13146282)
Seems like grandfather of babel. Why would anyone use it, when babel has moved miles forward?
Re:Traceur – A JavaScript.next-to-JavaScript-of-today compiler by Kwastie on Saturday December 10, 2016 @12:01PM (#13146545)
I guess Google put more effort into TypeScript, this project seems like it's almost dead.
Re:Traceur – A JavaScript.next-to-JavaScript-of-today compiler by grenoire on Saturday December 10, 2016 @09:51AM (#13145860)
In short, this is Babel by Google that runs with its own additional runtime?
Re:Traceur – A JavaScript.next-to-JavaScript-of-today compiler by phpnode on Saturday December 10, 2016 @09:55AM (#13145885)
Traceur has been around for years, much longer than Babel, it's a Google project but afaik it's mostly the work of one person
Re:Traceur – A JavaScript.next-to-JavaScript-of-today compiler by kermire on Saturday December 10, 2016 @10:18AM (#13145983)
Traceur was the inspiration for Babel. Not the other way around.
Re:Traceur – A JavaScript.next-to-JavaScript-of-today compiler by hzoo on Saturday December 10, 2016 @12:13PM (#13146622)
Yep!

> We also presented Traceur at NodeConf 2011. The video is available on YouTube [1]

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=nt...

Re:Traceur – A JavaScript.next-to-JavaScript-of-today compiler by pornel on Saturday December 10, 2016 @10:45AM (#13146122)
Traceur doesn't use semver. I've used it for a while, but frequent breakages were annoying. Having to lock it down to an ageing version and being afraid to update it is a liability.
Re:Traceur – A JavaScript.next-to-JavaScript-of-today compiler by whatever_dude on Saturday December 10, 2016 @12:21PM (#13146670)
Adding "Traceur" in the title would make this more clear. It's an old project, and, I believe, mostly forgotten.

I actually assumed the link was a new announcement.

Re:Traceur – A JavaScript.next-to-JavaScript-of-today compiler by SimeVidas on Saturday December 10, 2016 @01:44PM (#13147140)
You must be new here. The titles are supposed to be vague and clickbaity. Don't ask me why; that's just how things are here on HN.
Re:Traceur – A JavaScript.next-to-JavaScript-of-today compiler by whatever_dude on Sunday December 11, 2016 @09:35PM (#13155086)
You can check the age of an account by clicking on the user name.

I tend to prefer direct discourse online rather than cynicism or sarcasm.

Re:Traceur – A JavaScript.next-to-JavaScript-of-today compiler by SimeVidas on Monday December 12, 2016 @02:35PM (#13161126)
Why not both? “Normal” criticism is boring and gets ignored; you have to add sarcasm to increase the likelihood of a response.
Re:Traceur – A JavaScript.next-to-JavaScript-of-today compiler by sctb on Saturday December 10, 2016 @12:23PM (#13146681)
Yes, thank you. We've updated the title.