News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:AMD responds to Linux kernel maintainer's rejection of AM... by wmf on Friday December 09, 2016 @06:27PM (#13142799)
It's amazing that one guy with little financial interest in the results or effects can make that call for everyone.

Impartial expert judges are usually considered a good thing. Note that Dave Airlie is not acting on a whim here; the Linux development community has discussed HALs for probably 20 years and has come to the conclusion that they are a net negative. For better or worse, the Linux development process does not care about democracy or market share or vendor relations. It's a somewhat unusual way to build software, but the result pretty much speaks for itself.

Re:AMD responds to Linux kernel maintainer's rejection of AM... by pjmlp on Monday December 12, 2016 @11:04AM (#13159010)
Yep, each vendor that doesn't want to deal with it, just forks it, never contributing anything back.