Re:A Nasal Spray That Was Supposed to Replace Sleep
by baq on Thursday December 08, 2016 @05:00PM
(#13134685)
i agree wholeheartedly, but the next comment by boona ("Considering it costs between $100 million to $1 billion to get a drug approved by the FDA (depending on the study you look at), I can see why they wouldn't touch it.") highlights the issue: profit is only an incentive to do it; the initial cost is there either way and somebody has to cover it. if it's not private companies, who would that be...?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A Nasal Spray That Was Supposed to Replace Sleep
by gozur88 on Friday December 09, 2016 @12:50AM
(#13136951)
That's what the Orphan Drug Act of 1983 was all about. In theory companies have enough incentive to produce these kinds of drugs.
Re:A Nasal Spray That Was Supposed to Replace Sleep
by amitdeshwar on Thursday December 08, 2016 @06:07PM
(#13135160)