Re:A Nasal Spray That Was Supposed to Replace Sleep
by baq on Thursday December 08, 2016 @05:00PM
(#13134685)
i agree wholeheartedly, but the next comment by boona ("Considering it costs between $100 million to $1 billion to get a drug approved by the FDA (depending on the study you look at), I can see why they wouldn't touch it.") highlights the issue: profit is only an incentive to do it; the initial cost is there either way and somebody has to cover it. if it's not private companies, who would that be...?
Re:A Nasal Spray That Was Supposed to Replace Sleep
by gozur88 on Friday December 09, 2016 @12:50AM
(#13136951)
That's what the Orphan Drug Act of 1983 was all about. In theory companies have enough incentive to produce these kinds of drugs.
Re:A Nasal Spray That Was Supposed to Replace Sleep
by amitdeshwar on Thursday December 08, 2016 @06:07PM
(#13135160)
I had a teacher who was narcoleptic -- sure it was funny when he would fall asleep in the middle of class, but when his wife died he wasn't in a position to take care of all five of his children, so his 17 year old daughter had to forego her dreams of college in order to take care of her siblings. This probably isn't the best venue to say this, but it really saddens me when people's lives are ruined because there isn't a profit in helping them.