News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Future of Privacy by idlewords on Tuesday December 06, 2016 @03:44PM (#13118163)
This political story does not belong on HN.
Re:The Future of Privacy by pclstyle on Tuesday December 06, 2016 @04:07PM (#13118342)
out of curiosity, since you seem to be a veteran to HN – what makes this a "political story"?
Re:The Future of Privacy by idlewords on Tuesday December 06, 2016 @04:12PM (#13118383)
Not only is privacy an inherently political issue, but the point of departure for the article is Apple resisting the FBI.

I disagree with dang's decision to impose "political detox" on the site this week, but since he's done it, let's hold him to it.

Re:The Future of Privacy by dang on Tuesday December 06, 2016 @04:21PM (#13118445)
Yes by all means, though the phrase "hold him to it" sounds odd to my ears. You're talking about giving us what we asked for, which I appreciate, especially since you don't agree with the idea, which I respect.

I also appreciate your including the qualifier 'this week', because that's a critical detail and one thing I learned yesterday is that there's a risk of it getting lost in the shuffle. We don't want this to go beyond a week, least of all if it was a bad idea in the first place.

Re:The Future of Privacy by drewrv on Tuesday December 06, 2016 @05:08PM (#13118745)
Following absurd rules to the letter is a form of protest. That's what I understand "hold him to it" means.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Work-to-rule https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malicious_compliance

Re:The Future of Privacy by DanBC on Tuesday December 06, 2016 @04:10PM (#13118368)
idlewords is trolling.
Re:The Future of Privacy by idlewords on Tuesday December 06, 2016 @04:18PM (#13118430)
That's a personal attack.
Re:The Future of Privacy by dang on Tuesday December 06, 2016 @04:24PM (#13118468)
No, I think he genuinely cares.
Re:The Future of Privacy by edgesrazor on Tuesday December 06, 2016 @04:10PM (#13118369)
It's by William Gibson, so it kind of does.
[dead]
Re:The Future of Privacy by SomeStupidPoint on Tuesday December 06, 2016 @04:33PM (#13118526)
I think that the detox week reeks of the terrible practice of faux "safespaces" and the inclination of technical people to not be as politically involved as they should be and simply deny the importance.

That said, it's not my website and if they want to try this for a week, we can. At the end of the week though, I expect that we'll have a discussion about it and hash out if it was a good decision or not.

(Im really hoping they'll release a list of posts that were flagged as part of political detox, so we can talk explicitly about which parts we think are good or bad to ban.)

Re:The Future of Privacy by cbr on Tuesday December 06, 2016 @04:13PM (#13118392)
Re:The Future of Privacy by zzzzzzzzzman on Tuesday December 06, 2016 @04:23PM (#13118460)
Thanks for the link, I saw this post yesterday and completely disagree with the "experiment".

You can see dang messed with one of my comment chains last week because my decent arguments "incited flame wars".

It's all fake and silly micromanagement over a non-existent problem