News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Jolla’s Sailfish certified as Russian government’s first ... by EGreg on Tuesday November 29, 2016 @11:44PM (#13068545)
Guess what, "social" apps should help local communities without the signal having to go to a server farm halfway around the world. India rejected internet.org for that reason. Rural Africa doesn't need drones to organize community dinner or call a plumber.
Re:Jolla’s Sailfish certified as Russian government’s first ... by Johnny555 on Wednesday November 30, 2016 @03:02AM (#13069186)
That depends on why you're using the social app. If you're using it to find a local plumber, then sure, you only need ot to stay in your local area (but what's 'local'? Is that within your town, your county, your state or your country? If you want to fix a leak, you probably want a plumber in your town, if you're replumbing an entire school, then you may be happy to get bids from plumbers 50 miles away).

But if you're using your social network to find the solution to your recurring plumbing problem that the last 3 plumbers you hired couldn't fix, then you'll probably be just as happy with an answer from a plumber from across the world as you would from an plumber next door.

The power of online social networks it that they aren't limited to whoever is in your town.

Re:Jolla’s Sailfish certified as Russian government’s first ... by EGreg on Wednesday November 30, 2016 @01:18PM (#13073156)
But they can still live on VPNs and not the open internet. Requests from outside can be blocked. Sure an external router or DNS server might go down but the internal network would be intact. The routing can even be updated on internal routers. People can invite others to the network, and the whole invitation system can be throttled. Byebye DDOS
Re:Jolla’s Sailfish certified as Russian government’s first ... by Johnny555 on Wednesday November 30, 2016 @03:00PM (#13074169)
How does an "internal network" work with an online community? Are members across a community hard-wired in to this online community?

Otherwise it's still subject to all of the same DDoS attacks of a global social network provider. Except that it'll be easier to take it down since it has fewer resources to protect itself (i.e. it doesn't have multiple 10 gbit pipes to the internet and likely can't blackhole traffic with BGP routes)

So yes, the internal network may be fine if a DDoS attack takes down the router to the rest of the internet, but does that matter since no one can reach it?

Or are you envisioning entire communities unplugging themselves from the internet if any community member is under DoS attack?

Re:Jolla’s Sailfish certified as Russian government’s first ... by EGreg on Wednesday November 30, 2016 @03:35PM (#13074461)
https://www.purevpn.com/blog/ddos-protected-vpn-purevpn/

A DDoS attack is dependent on flooding the users connection with traffic, so if this connection cannot be established, a DDoS is unable to have a significant impact

Re:Jolla’s Sailfish certified as Russian government’s first ... by Johnny555 on Wednesday November 30, 2016 @04:38PM (#13074931)
Your first statement is true, but the traffic doesn't have to be successfully terminated for an attack -- a DDoS attack can easily fill your internet pipe with traffic even if your firewall silently ignores it (and indeed, once the attack is underway, it's likely that your servers can't keep up with the request rate, so many of the connections are going unanswered). So a VPN is no magic bullet.
Re:Jolla’s Sailfish certified as Russian government’s first ... by Dylan16807 on Wednesday November 30, 2016 @02:02AM (#13069005)
It's the last mile that's the hard part, not the backhaul. The internet.org objections were totally unrelated.