Gas lighting doesn't change the tone of your rhetoric. Drawing conclusions from what you said isn't a big stretch, given that you were dismissive, and clearly invested in the scientific portion of the MIT statement:
> Science and all that
Really sounds like you chose MIT. You know there's a part in there where they acknowledge climate change? That's pretty important.
> Social Justice Rhetoric on HN.
Again, really hard to take you seriously.
You engaged in standard read-in to my comment, not even trying to understand what was meant. You say that "it's hard to take you seriously", yet the HN guidelines are clearly on my side of this issue.
I also dislike the increasing SJW content on HN. Leave that stuff to the Tumblrinas, I want my tech news back.
You're right: HN isn't supposed to have so much political content. It's even included in the guidelines.
Help be part of the solution. Flag politically charged articles. Strip political speech from your comments. Call out in a non-partisan way comments that are injecting politics needlessly into the conversation. Submit and up vote tech articles you find interesting.
this isn't the sort of rhetoric I enjoy seeing on HN
Conversely, I don't enjoy seeing social justice rhetoric on HN. I come here for the tech, startup, and programming news and commentary. So I suppose we're even. The fact that you mistakenly read my view as pro-Trump only highlights the dangers of this kind of content on HN.