News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Thoughts on Flash by gaius on Thursday April 29, 2010 @11:33AM (#1304761)
Apples position is that proprietary implementations of open standards is the way to go (tho' of course WebKit is completely open).
Re:Thoughts on Flash by tomlin on Thursday April 29, 2010 @11:49AM (#1304832)
Thought:

Proprietary isn't bad. Open isn't great. Proprietary vs. open is bad. Proprietary + open is great.

Proprietary implementations are a (sometimes) necessary interstitial step towards great open implementations. Save the "VS." narrative for Street Fighter II.

Re:Thoughts on Flash by potatolicious on Thursday April 29, 2010 @01:02PM (#1305108)
> "Proprietary implementations are a (sometimes) necessary interstitial step towards great open implementations."

True, but Flash is a closed standard with a closed implementation. Adobe likes to claim it is open - but the fact remains that not only is it impossible to write an open implementation of their incomplete spec, but Adobe has actively sought to keep core components proprietary even in spec and prevent competing implementations.

That's the part that irks me about Adobe's role in this issue - they're playing themselves and Flash off as this open savior of the web when they've actively been evil in that regard. If you're closed, great, do your thing; if you're open, then actually open your spec - don't open part of it and then go after the other half with lawyers.

Re:Thoughts on Flash by tomlin on Thursday April 29, 2010 @01:32PM (#1305243)
So Adobe gets tossed aside in favor of HTML5/canvas. Or an open version of the SWF format with no licensing issues emerges. I am fine with that. If Adobe wants to be stupid, they are more than welcome to.

Apple is calling the kettle black with the proprietary argument. We can drill down to specific layers but the effects are the same to the developer coding on that layer.

Re:Thoughts on Flash by telemachos on Thursday April 29, 2010 @01:04PM (#1305118)
I'm not flaming, trolling or baiting, but I am curious: under what circumstances do you think proprietary implementations are necessary?
Re:Thoughts on Flash by tomlin on Thursday April 29, 2010 @01:25PM (#1305212)
OS has contributed to advancements in design, but proprietary initiatives employ a fleet of people to research, design and case study a technology. They do it all day and not as a side project after work.

Again, it isn't a case of one vs. another. I wish we didn't need to take a side and finally come to a conclusion that both are good in their own ways. Evolution is key.

Re:Thoughts on Flash by pyre on Thursday April 29, 2010 @02:56PM (#1305561)
There are plenty of people that are employed full-time to work on Open Source software. Don't perpetuate the myth that all Open Source software is created by people 'in their free time.'
Re:Thoughts on Flash by tomlin on Thursday April 29, 2010 @04:50PM (#1305986)
Most aren't. That is why the myth exists. Plenty < Majority.
Re:Thoughts on Flash by gaius on Thursday April 29, 2010 @01:22PM (#1305203)
If your implementation relies on technology that you have licensed from a third party.
Re:Thoughts on Flash by iron_ball on Thursday April 29, 2010 @02:00PM (#1305360)
To be fair... Zangief vs. Sagat is an abomination, but Zangief PLUS Sagat would cure world hunger.