News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Thoughts on Flash by potatolicious on Thursday April 29, 2010 @01:02PM (#1305108)
> "Proprietary implementations are a (sometimes) necessary interstitial step towards great open implementations."

True, but Flash is a closed standard with a closed implementation. Adobe likes to claim it is open - but the fact remains that not only is it impossible to write an open implementation of their incomplete spec, but Adobe has actively sought to keep core components proprietary even in spec and prevent competing implementations.

That's the part that irks me about Adobe's role in this issue - they're playing themselves and Flash off as this open savior of the web when they've actively been evil in that regard. If you're closed, great, do your thing; if you're open, then actually open your spec - don't open part of it and then go after the other half with lawyers.

Re:Thoughts on Flash by tomlin on Thursday April 29, 2010 @01:32PM (#1305243)
So Adobe gets tossed aside in favor of HTML5/canvas. Or an open version of the SWF format with no licensing issues emerges. I am fine with that. If Adobe wants to be stupid, they are more than welcome to.

Apple is calling the kettle black with the proprietary argument. We can drill down to specific layers but the effects are the same to the developer coding on that layer.