News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Go fonts by crsmithdev on Wednesday November 16, 2016 @09:41PM (#12973788)
Yuck, the monospace font feels too dense, and dislike the serifs.
Re:Go fonts by userbinator on Wednesday November 16, 2016 @09:51PM (#12973839)
I think the rendering is horrible too, with plenty of colour fringing and unevenness.

The monospace font reminds me of the generic "Asian product manual font" - although the individual shapes are slightly different, it has a similar feeling to MS Mincho:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2013Jul/att-...

Re:Go fonts by honkhonkpants on Wednesday November 16, 2016 @10:08PM (#12973899)
Images of the way a font was rendered on some output device are always going to look weird and wrong on another one.
Re:Go fonts by TheOtherHobbes on Wednesday November 16, 2016 @10:18PM (#12973948)
The monospace is kind of okay, I guess, but considering the competition there's nothing special about it. Many users will be coding with colour keyword support anyway, so the idea that it's going to be super-great for Go code is strange.

I found the proportional font really hard to read.

It's not as if Google can't do good typography:

https://fonts.google.com/about

So this seems like a rather self-indulgent and not wholly successful side project.

Re:Go fonts by 4ad on Thursday November 17, 2016 @06:05AM (#12976337)
You do realise that B&H designed the original OS X system font, Lucida Grande, right?
Re:Go fonts by enneff on Thursday November 17, 2016 @04:09PM (#12981590)
And also the original MacOS font, Chicago!
Re:Go fonts by sjm on Wednesday November 16, 2016 @10:17PM (#12973942)
It's a pity when newer typefaces don't have lighter weights — they look far better on high resolution displays than normal/regular weights, which look almost bold.

My favourite example and what I use daily, Office Code Pro Light: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sjrmanning/darkokai/screen...

Re:Go fonts by lygaret on Wednesday November 16, 2016 @10:41PM (#12974036)
Thanks for the recommendation! going to swap it in as a replacement for Fira Mono for a while, see how it feels.
Re:Go fonts by vertebrate on Thursday November 17, 2016 @03:47AM (#12975614)
This is MacOS font rendering for you, in Linux normal weight looks normal
Re:Go fonts by 4ad on Thursday November 17, 2016 @10:35AM (#12978310)
Or rather, in macOS it looks normal and in Linux it looks too thin.
Re:Go fonts by tomcam on Thursday November 17, 2016 @03:10AM (#12975422)
Wow. Gorgeous.
Re:Go fonts by mrweasel on Thursday November 17, 2016 @02:33AM (#12975215)
It's a matter of personal opinion of cause, but I find it extremely easy on the eyes. Some one else posted a screenshot with some code displayed using the Go font, and it's extremely readable, to me at least.
Re:Go fonts by dbl9 on Thursday November 17, 2016 @10:44AM (#12978397)
I love serifs and haven't found a good monospaced serif font yet. This one looks good but has some minor bugs like spacing and * not being centered vertically for the times you write OCaml or C comments. I'm trying it out anyway because I've been missing serifs in my terminal and editor for too long.
Re:Go fonts by venantius on Wednesday November 16, 2016 @10:46PM (#12974054)
Agree - I find these fonts deeply unpleasant, and would never choose to work with the monospaced option.
Re:Go fonts by romanovcode on Thursday November 17, 2016 @07:43AM (#12976914)
Yup. Horrible fonts IMO. I would never, ever work with these.