News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Show HN: Whosfiring by romanovcode on Tuesday November 15, 2016 @05:29AM (#12956955)
While I totally agree about this site, it's stupid to disregard JS as a whole. Imagine websites like FB without JS - it would be horrible.
Re:Show HN: Whosfiring by beagle3 on Tuesday November 15, 2016 @05:33AM (#12956971)
You don't have to imagine, you can try: https://mbasic.facebook.com/ - a lot of people prefer it to the standard monstrosity.
Re:Show HN: Whosfiring by ecma on Tuesday November 15, 2016 @06:34AM (#12957220)
I use mbasic.facebook as my main was of interacting with Facebook. I acknowledge that my choice to disable JavaScript is unusual and will jump through some hoops because of that, but it's not excusable for a website to display /nothing/ pre-script like the OP does.
Re:Show HN: Whosfiring by eeZah7Ux on Tuesday November 15, 2016 @06:29AM (#12957203)
Good example. After getting used to the 1998 feel, it's much more practical than the usual one.
Re:Show HN: Whosfiring by lucideer on Tuesday November 15, 2016 @09:00AM (#12957984)
The great thing about this is that it's paginated. You can literally "scroll infinitely" through feeds without creating a ridiculous scroll offset and filling up browser memory (or losing Ctrl-F functionality due to Facebook's complex memory-saving exercises)
Re:Show HN: Whosfiring by mixmastamyk on Tuesday November 15, 2016 @12:08PM (#12959923)
Nice but it could use a bit more whitespace, feels crowded.
Re:Show HN: Whosfiring by sealthedeal on Tuesday November 15, 2016 @09:24AM (#12958182)
this makes me miss the OG fb. I dont use facebook much, but I think I would use it quite a bit more if this was the layout.
Re:Show HN: Whosfiring by tluyben2 on Tuesday November 15, 2016 @06:05AM (#12957101)
There is a place for JS but most sites don't need it or at least don't need to drive the entire site. The problem is that Jquery now is 'bad' because it, what was it again, is not suitable for structuring big apps (ofcourse it is not; it's not meant to be an MVC or whatever framework; it's helper library to make Javascript easier to use). So it is obvious (and I see it all around me) that people build sites now like they are building Facebook, even though the site might have only 1 or 2 pages and no interactive functionality to speak off.

Still, this guy did it (took a long time between this site being up and the post on HN that instigated it) while the rest of the readers in that thread who thought it would be a good idea, including me, didn't. So kudos for 'just doing it' anyway.

Edit: I checked hours ago and then it was clean but apparently there is no moderation on it either... So this site would've taken literally less than an hour including hosting setup to put together? Still I didn't do it while I did like FuckedCompany and think it's good to have something like it.

Re:Show HN: Whosfiring by pc86 on Tuesday November 15, 2016 @10:18AM (#12958666)
It's a good thing mibbiting didn't disregard JS as a whole, then.
Re:Show HN: Whosfiring by bryanrasmussen on Tuesday November 15, 2016 @07:40AM (#12957501)
This isn't a website like FB.
Re:Show HN: Whosfiring by bandrami on Tuesday November 15, 2016 @10:04AM (#12958543)
Huh? I always use the mbasic Facebook site: it's a much, much better experience.