News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by Grishnakh on Sunday November 13, 2016 @06:53PM (#12946511)
I can't reply to stouset for some stupid reason, but why is it "absurd" to not want to eat horse for texture reasons? My understanding is that horse meat generally does not taste that good and is very tough, because those animals get a lot of exercise; it's like deer meat. Some people like venison, and there's no stigma attached to eating it, but it's hard to buy because demand is low (and they're not raised as livestock), and the meat is generally considered "gamey" and difficult to cook properly so it's tender instead of tough and nasty. Cow and especially chicken is popular meat because it's both relatively cheap and rather easy (and fast) to cook. It's really hard to screw up cooking chicken in fact.
Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by tomjakubowski on Sunday November 13, 2016 @07:54PM (#12946732)
> I can't reply to stouset for some stupid reason

On deeply nested comments, if it hasn't been long since the post was made you have to click the "permalink" ("XX minutes ago" or "XX hours ago") link to reply. I think the extra step is to help slow down flamewars ("do I really need to reply to this comment, right now?".

Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by Grishnakh on Sunday November 13, 2016 @09:56PM (#12947204)
Thanks for the info, that's very useful.

If this is the intention, it seems like it'd make more sense to throw up roadblocks to only someone else who's in the comment chain, rather than to someone who hasn't been involved at all and is just chiming in. Usually, those flamewars are long chains of comments between two people.

Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by hueving on Monday November 14, 2016 @02:06AM (#12948031)
It's also useful to slowdown people dog-piling the 'obvious' response to new comments.
Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by vxNsr on Sunday November 13, 2016 @08:29PM (#12946866)
Hmmm... I didn't know that thanks for the heads up.
Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by Spooky23 on Sunday November 13, 2016 @08:26PM (#12946855)
Many people wouldn't be able to distinguish from beef. I had it once in Quebec, much to the amusement of a jerk waiter.

It's not tough, just very lean and thus prone to overcooking. Honestly it tasted pretty good, I thought it was grass fed beef.

Venison is a lot gamier. I only like it in stews.

Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by bzbarsky on Tuesday November 15, 2016 @12:03PM (#12959868)
Deer meet is hard to buy, at least in the US, partly because the US has ridiculous laws prohibiting transportation of venison from US deer across state lines in various ways.

> and they're not raised as livestock

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deer_farm#Deer_Farming_in_New_... -- not quite as many of them as sheep there, but you definitely see a bunch of deer farms just driving around.

In fact, in my experience you're more likely to see New Zealand venison in a US store than US venison, because of the above laws prohibiting transportation.

Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by schrodinger on Sunday November 13, 2016 @11:14PM (#12947519)
I think hes saying that it's absurd to not eat horse for reasons other than taste or texture, which would agree with what you're saying
Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by dagw on Monday November 14, 2016 @03:21AM (#12948315)
horse, at least the horse I've had, was very tender. It did however have slightly odd aftertaste I wasn't too fond of.