News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by vpayette on Sunday November 13, 2016 @01:59PM (#12944934)
We were engaged in 2006 and I forwarded that article to my soon to be wife. Her answer was: I don't think this is funny. I ended up buying a 10k diamond ring. We're still happily married with 1 beautiful 8 y.o. daughter. Ask any married guy and they'll all say the same: pick your battles!
Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by atomical on Sunday November 13, 2016 @02:17PM (#12945051)
How bad do the fights have to be to make 10k not worth arguing over?
Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by floodyberry- on Sunday November 13, 2016 @09:18PM (#12947083)
It sounds more that both of you are [insanely lucky to be / oblivious of being] well off rather than that you're gifted with exceptional knowledge about marriage.
Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by gist on Sunday November 13, 2016 @02:56PM (#12945281)
Exactly. Who is one person to judge what someone else finds important or gets pleasure from even if invented by a marketing person? What is the value of a football or soccer game or a host of other things people spend money on. Ripoff is in the eyes of the beholder.
Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by hueving on Sunday November 13, 2016 @04:33PM (#12945798)
It doesn't cost 3 months salary and support death in Africa to watch a football or soccer game.
Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by shard on Sunday November 13, 2016 @08:51PM (#12946966)
Although it does support permanent brain injury in football players.
Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by odiroot on Sunday November 13, 2016 @05:03PM (#12945938)
Who said it was funny in the first place? The article touches some important, serious topics.
Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by neutronicus on Sunday November 13, 2016 @07:51PM (#12946719)
I think she's letting him pretend he was joking so as to avoid a fight...