News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by digitaltrees on Sunday November 13, 2016 @01:34PM (#12944788)
Check out this article, http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/02/how...

It shows how the concept of diamond engagement rings were completely invented by a specific ad campaign; first in America and now expanding to the rest of the world.

They were specifically trying to create social pressure to buy the most expensive ring possible; to reinforce the impression that a diamond ring demonstrated wealth and ability to take care of a spouse; and even set the three months salary purchase price target most people reference.

If there's ever been a greater con so openly and deliberately imposed on society, I can't think of one off the top my head.

Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by lqdc13 on Sunday November 13, 2016 @10:59PM (#12947461)
Everyone knows about it and yet everyone does it.

It is like getting a luxury brand car or a watch or living in a certain part of town. All aren't practical.

When social pressure is already there, you are asking the female partner to break the norm which can be tough.

Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by Fiahil on Monday November 14, 2016 @05:57AM (#12948927)
Come on, it's 2016, the female partner can take care of herself. Valiant knights are not needed anymore, she's slaying dragons too.
Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by delecti on Monday November 14, 2016 @10:49AM (#12950509)
It's even worse than those. A luxury car will probably be high quality, and might have extra features not standard on more reasonably priced cars. Living in a certain part of town is probably safer. A fancy diamond is only expensive because people think it can be expensive.