News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Stallman: Why it is important not to have children (2012) by diea on Saturday November 12, 2016 @11:48AM (#12938703)
No, no, maybe (I am 25y/o)

I read many responses mentioning you should have kids to 'pass on your genes' so potentially your offspring can be a 'better you' and improve the world.

I would argue that adoption could be a good alternative. When adopting, you are potentially doing all this without actually contributing to the world population increase.

Also, I think RMS made a respectable choice, and probably indeed contributed more to society than if he would have had kids. Not having kids is IMHO probably a harder decision than actually having kids.

Re:Stallman: Why it is important not to have children (2012) by unclenoriega on Saturday November 12, 2016 @12:44PM (#12939016)
I think you're right, but your phrasing is a bit odd. If you adopt, you are explicitly not passing on your genes. I think a better word here is 'memes' (in the original sense) or 'values' if 'memes' is too polluted.
Re:Stallman: Why it is important not to have children (2012) by diea on Sunday November 13, 2016 @07:02AM (#12942944)
Agreed :-)