I always saw it as a strong portable machine for people who needed to work on the go. I'm sure video editors, photo editors, audio people use shortcuts and do touch typing.

I know a number of video and photo editors, and while this is anecdata, I'm positive that none of them touch type. I've seen a few of the hunt and peck on a regular basis. I mean, I'm a software dev and I'm not great at typing either.

As a professional photo/video/audio editor, my problem with this is not "touch-typing" but rather it's another thing I'll have to adjust my senses to. I'll have to relearn the keyboard and spend unnecessary time adjusting settings and configuration for something I don't need.

On top of all this, the keyboard will feel more fragile and have more complexity. I prefer reliability over unnecessary complication.

I believe Linus Torvalds used to use a MacBook (can't remember which one) as his dev machine. He most definitely runs Linux and this has nothing to do with macOS being Unix under the hood. I think hardware quality is a major factor why the MacBook is popular.

>> The Macbook Pro was never marketed as a developer's machine.

That's probably true, but isn't its success in part driven by the deluge of Linux/Unix users who were thrilled to finally have a Unix based machine with a beautiful UI that ran on Intel CPUs? Also increased sales from word of mouth by those same ex Linux users telling their Windows using friends to switch?

One thing constantly said to founders here is "don't let a vocal minority come in, tell you they love your product, and then turn into bullies that tell you how you should make said product. You never made it for them; they aren't your market. Don't get confused into thinking they are, just because they're loud." I think that about sums up the relationship between Apple and software developers who use their hardware.

I don't think Linux refugees and their recommendations would be enough to make something a top-selling product.

I think many in HN make the mistake of mixing UNIX and developers on the same sentence.

I happened to use LC III Macs and was a developer back then.

A few years ago I did some work related to acquiring new customers, which required creating an iOS application.

None of those experiences had anything to do with UNIX, yet I am a developer.

Personally, the only reason I am not found of the new Macbook Pro is the price, as I rather have something like the W510's successor.

It's a choice NeXT made, though.

The reason being the competition against Sun and SGI, as an easy way to bring developers into the system, not to let them out again.

Objective-C frameworks for user space and drivers, use of distributed objects, designing GUI applications via Interface Builder, productivity applications like Lotus Improv and Virtuoso, the way applications were packaged didn't had much to do with UNIX culture as such.

> The Macbook Pro was never marketed as a developer's machine.

And in fact AFAIK the standard developer machine at Apple is an iMac (which has an escape key on its standard keyboard).

At the very least, there is then a missed opportunity on Apple's part to continue serving an audience that:

A) Has been served by Apple in the past B) Provides value to Apple in the form of developing all kinds of software solutions that it's other users directly benefit from

Gonna point you to this reply, which is quite good:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12818193

Quite a coincidence to discover how well it serves them in the developer market. I think they planned it.