News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Is This Economist Too Far Ahead of His Time? by mmusson on Wednesday October 19, 2016 @08:38PM (#12749036)
I think you are missing the main thrust of the book. He is not trying to convince you that em-based AI is the likely future. He chose the less examined possibility as a starting point, but the main part of the book is to enumerate the predictions that flow from that premise.

This is interesting and worth examining even if the premise is wrong. Sometimes examining a familiar topic in unfamiliar terrain yields new insights.

Re:Is This Economist Too Far Ahead of His Time? by paulddraper on Thursday October 20, 2016 @12:44AM (#12749775)
"False premise" is a logical fallacy, not a virtue.
Re:Is This Economist Too Far Ahead of His Time? by FreakLegion on Thursday October 20, 2016 @01:40AM (#12749953)
A false premise isn't a logical fallacy. Arguments can be logically valid yet wrong, and vice versa.
Re:Is This Economist Too Far Ahead of His Time? by tashi on Thursday October 20, 2016 @03:12AM (#12750274)
Right, and taking a premise you believe to be false and mapping out its consequences has a long and noble history; e.g., non-Euclidean geometry.
Re:Is This Economist Too Far Ahead of His Time? by paulddraper on Thursday October 20, 2016 @05:14AM (#12750772)
Okay then...if not a logical fallacy, then just a fallacy ("mistaken belief").

The sort of prognostication that would do poorly on a debate team, because its premises are unsound.