How One Goldman Sachs Trader Made More Than $100M

Re:How One Goldman Sachs Trader Made More Than $100M by kafkaesq on Wednesday October 19, 2016 @06:43PM (#12748358)

Really now?

Goldman Sachs will pay $5.06bn for its role in the 2008 financial crisis, the US Department of Justice said on Monday. The settlement, over the sale of mortgage-backed securities from 2005 to 2007, was first announced in January.

“This resolution holds Goldman Sachs accountable for its serious misconduct in falsely assuring investors that securities it sold were backed by sound mortgages, when it knew that they were full of mortgages that were likely to fail,” acting associate attorney general Stuart Delery said in a statement.

-- https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/apr/11/goldman-sac...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How One Goldman Sachs Trader Made More Than $100M by brianwawok on Wednesday October 19, 2016 @06:51PM (#12748406)

Your quote is about honesty. OPs quote was about unhedged rusk. They have little to no relation. You can be both a dishonest trader AND a smart one.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How One Goldman Sachs Trader Made More Than $100M by kafkaesq on Wednesday October 19, 2016 @07:15PM (#12748552)

Actually the comment I was responding to was about "running a tight shop" -- which is about operational integrity in general (not just on the matter of unhedged risk).

In the, you know, "would you buy a used car from these guys?" sense.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How One Goldman Sachs Trader Made More Than $100M by notyourwork on Wednesday October 19, 2016 @08:05PM (#12748839)

Perhaps a difference of definition but I don't consider a tight shop to have anything to do with morals or integrity. Tight shops I always considered efficient and optimized. Car dealerships are shady, but they can run a tight shop.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How One Goldman Sachs Trader Made More Than $100M by kafkaesq on Wednesday October 19, 2016 @08:14PM (#12748892)

Until they get caught (and heavily fined). Whereupon management suddenly decides that maybe those practices weren't so "tight" after all.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How One Goldman Sachs Trader Made More Than $100M by qaq on Wednesday October 19, 2016 @08:44PM (#12749061)

The only reason GS is still around is because they did what they did. They protected their shareholders the fine is trivial (less than 10%) compared to the losses they would have taken if they followed the course of action that everyone else did.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How One Goldman Sachs Trader Made More Than $100M by kafkaesq on Wednesday October 19, 2016 @09:24PM (#12749240)

A $13b bailout on suspiciously favorable terms had something to do with it, also.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How One Goldman Sachs Trader Made More Than $100M by qaq on Wednesday October 19, 2016 @10:29PM (#12749415)

What is suspiciously favorable about it? the terms were uniform. The real kick back to all banks was the unwind of AIG.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How One Goldman Sachs Trader Made More Than $100M by kafkaesq on Thursday October 20, 2016 @01:08PM (#12754108)

What is suspiciously favorable about it?

I trust that you're aware of the basic chronology. If not, it should be fairly easy for you to look into.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How One Goldman Sachs Trader Made More Than $100M by qaq on Thursday October 20, 2016 @08:23PM (#12757322)

Yep and? Every IB had to secure a deal GS got money from Berkshire Hathaway, everyone else got acquired Lehman could not secure a deal. Unlike in every other deal government was not providing downside guarantees for Berkshire Hathaway investment in GS. Government did provide huge guarantees to JPM and every other bank that acquired an IB.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How One Goldman Sachs Trader Made More Than $100M by notyourwork on Wednesday October 19, 2016 @08:18PM (#12748921)

Absolutely right! Its usually context specific.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How One Goldman Sachs Trader Made More Than $100M by qaq on Wednesday October 19, 2016 @07:43PM (#12748712)

Operational integrity for investment bank is to a very significant degree risk management. Integrity as in having control over something not in a moral sense. In the case you referenced I'd rather see GS's counterparties taking more blame. The whole we are poor guys running multi-billion dollar funds and charging millions in fees didn't do due diligence and want to blame someone else thing is pure BS.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How One Goldman Sachs Trader Made More Than $100M by qaq on Wednesday October 19, 2016 @06:51PM (#12748404)

They made money and later payed a fine , how is this disputes a statement that GS does not take large unhedged positions?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How One Goldman Sachs Trader Made More Than $100M by kafkaesq on Wednesday October 19, 2016 @07:39PM (#12748692)

The point is that the assertion you attempted to make in favor of the idea that GS just of course wouldn't take large unhedged positions -- "they run a tight shop" -- just doesn't have a great deal of solid backing.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How One Goldman Sachs Trader Made More Than $100M by qaq on Wednesday October 19, 2016 @07:44PM (#12748719)

If you provide an example of a large unhedged position that GS has on the books I'll totally believe you.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How One Goldman Sachs Trader Made More Than $100M by kafkaesq on Wednesday October 19, 2016 @07:51PM (#12748755)

You can believe whatever you want. Based on my own research over the years -- and personal dealings with people who have worked there -- I tend not to trust that "shop".

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How One Goldman Sachs Trader Made More Than $100M by branchless on Wednesday October 19, 2016 @08:11PM (#12748874)

Actually they hedged there by lying and selling their crap on instead of holding the baby.

[ Parent | on HN ]