But mostly because I don't want him waking up at night screaming from nightmares. I like my dearly won sleep.
You made the choice to have a child. You made the choice to entertain them with YouTube. The possibility of them seeing an advertisement for alcohol (my goodness! Your son will turn into a tattooed hooligan in a week!) is not sufficient reason for handing the internet over to state censorship.
In short, stop trying to make society raise your kid for you. Give independence and self-responsibility a try, you might like it.
In the UK advertisers are forbidden from advertising alcohol to children.
Here's the regulators page for adverts aimed at children: https://www.asa.org.uk/News-resources/Hot-Topics/Children-an...
Here's their page for adverts about alcohol (note that some of those ads were online): https://www.asa.org.uk/News-resources/Hot-Topics/Alcohol.asp...
There's currently a gap in regulation. App makers have apps targeted at children (and with an age range of eg 4+); those apps carry ads; those ad networks use information about the phone owner to decide the age suitability of ad.
This loophole is likely to close in 2017 or 2018
I do agree that apps (or videos) directed at children shouldn't show non-child-safe ads. I just don't see what does that have to do with the proposal under discussion.
I'm not trying to say that it causes alcoholism. I'm just responding to someone dumping a useless anecdote.
Maybe don't let your kid that DOESNT EVEN READ yet zombiefy itself?
Maybe complain to Google/Apple about particular ads? Install some ad blocking software? Pay for youtube red? Purchase the ad-less versions of the apps?
Basically don't think that your inability to deal with the world warrants nationwide heavy handed regulation, please
Out in the real world, people will think you're weird and/or a religious nut if you don't drink at a business function. So why should I worry about my daughter seeing an advertisement for alcohol before her episode of Paw Patrol starts playing?