I have no idea if this solution to the problems posed is sound because before I can even get to the source code there is no description of how or even whether it solves the fundamental problems in the cryptographic situation it describes (viz. device which cannot straightaway engage in IP communication requires to receive unsolicitated securely-encrypted messages).
Please elaborate and clarify.
I'm very interested in any potential implementation that allows asymmetric conversations without a dedicated third node (if we don't like the name server) somewhere in between.
There are people, and/or messages, in which a lack of civility needn't warrant a complete dismissal. They're relatively rare.
I'm willing to give a hearing here. Crypto is, for better or worse, an area in which there is a tendency toward both informed and abrasive contributions.
I'm aware HN doesn't take well to that. I've been arguing the opposite strategy for the past few days with a friend (he likes tossing bollocks about, I prefer avoiding that). I'd advise ChoHag to tone it down (and reconsider their chosen handle), but contribute. I did consider vouching the flagged/dead comment, but decided against in this case.