News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Constraints on the Universe as a Numerical Simulation (2012) by kornork on Friday October 14, 2016 @12:49PM (#12709321)
If we're living in a simulation, the question of whether AIs can have consciousness is solved.
Re:Constraints on the Universe as a Numerical Simulation (2012) by maxerickson on Friday October 14, 2016 @12:51PM (#12709359)
What if there is a rule in the simulation preventing intelligences created by simulants from becoming sentient?

I suppose you can point at all the artificial simulants and their sentience, but as pointed out in a sibling comment, so what.

Re:Constraints on the Universe as a Numerical Simulation (2012) by astrodust on Friday October 14, 2016 @12:53PM (#12709372)
What if the simulation is actually being "run" inside an entity or organism that was the natural product of its environment?
Re:Constraints on the Universe as a Numerical Simulation (2012) by GavinMcG on Friday October 14, 2016 @01:01PM (#12709438)
Still, human intelligence would be simulated within that, presumably. So the platform might not be the obvious one, but the software would still be theoretically possible.

That, or there's some interface to that platform that provides a source of intelligence. Maybe we're nothing more than Docker containers running on God's hardware.

Re:Constraints on the Universe as a Numerical Simulation (2012) by fredfoobar on Friday October 14, 2016 @01:04PM (#12709463)
So, like a dream?
Re:Constraints on the Universe as a Numerical Simulation (2012) by mslev on Friday October 14, 2016 @12:51PM (#12709350)
Is there a difference between a conscious being and a being who has been programmed to believe it has a conscience?
Re:Constraints on the Universe as a Numerical Simulation (2012) by kornork on Friday October 14, 2016 @01:04PM (#12709465)
I'm no expert on philosophy, but I feel like consciousness is a subjective experience. So externally there would be no difference, but I'm pretty sure I'm conscious.

Of course, I've also heard of the illusion of consciousness, but that's where my brain explodes.

Re:Constraints on the Universe as a Numerical Simulation (2012) by skc on Friday October 14, 2016 @01:56PM (#12709880)
But what if consciousness itself is simulated. The problem here is that a simulation would have to adhere to a set of programmatic rules meaning that the only way consciousness could arise as we like to think we know it, is via some weird unintended side effect.
Re:Constraints on the Universe as a Numerical Simulation (2012) by pklausler on Friday October 14, 2016 @12:51PM (#12709360)
The question would be mooted.
Re:Constraints on the Universe as a Numerical Simulation (2012) by komali2 on Friday October 14, 2016 @01:36PM (#12709727)
How?