kornork
The original drawings have ambiguities in them; they are well done but perspective and scale are off, and there are lots of questions about particular details of the drawings. The AI drawings simply take these particular questionable details and render them as "real."
There should be real life artifacts for many of these tools. LLMs can just as easily go search the web for images of those as create completely unreliable, fictional renderings of the same.
I scrolled down a fair bit and didn't see anyone posting an alternative.
In the worst case, this is like "We released this sycophantic model because we're brain dead. To drive home the point, we had ChatGPT write this article too (because we're brain dead)."
I tend to rely on AI to write stuff for me that I don't care too much about. Writing something important requires me to struggle with the words to make sure I'm really saying what I want to say. So in the best case, if they relied on ChatGPT so much that it left a fingerprint, to me they're saying this incident really wasn't important.
By my reading, this is a clarification that if an agency makes a significant policy change or regulation, they ought to run it by the president first.
It doesn't preclude other branches of government from checking this power.
The first article talks plenty about why: people are eating less of the the things that are addictive to them, such as alcohol and cookies, which are a major source of calories.
So this is neurofeedback. But is it any better than existing neurofeedback which already makes use of computer games?
The article doesn't mention AI at all. We know that the number of books being released has exploded in general due to AI, but are those books also being released in audiobook form? Or is this increase due somehow to the use of AI in audiobook recording?
The article does hint at this - with some of the top authors recording hundreds of books - so maybe these folks have used AI to clone their voices and fast track the process?
Personally, I think AI has great potential here, even if only to fill in the gaps. Older, less loved books aren't recorded.
Additionally, there are several narrators that simply grate on my ears, or who my brain has simply learned to tune out, and it would be nice to have an option to switch to a (lower quality) AI version.
I'm surprised we haven't seen activation and cancelation fees start to get added.
But this was the whole value add of streaming over cable - the ability to stop paying for channels you don't want to watch - so... duh?
The best feature is that it auto-closes tabs. It makes having different spaces for work and personal browsing easy, and they are constantly adding convenience features.
It runs on Chromium. I don't know how that intersects with the ethical and standards issues around Chrome.
What are we expecting here? If there's a legal requirement Twitter has to follow, vs getting banned, what should they do?
Do we believe for a second that Meta/Threads will do anything differently?
The biggest risk with these systems is that they'll amplify the ability of bad people to do bad things.
While everyone else is trying to trick the AI into saying something offensive, the terrorists will be using it to build bioweapons.
I changed the prompt to this: "Rewrite this for brevity, in outline form:"
I prefer the responses this way, rather than the 3rd person book report style the other prompt returns.
So, like, we (Americans) have bought into this system where basic health care, which we all pay for and plan to rely on when we retire, doesn't cover something that everyone needs if they get old enough?
Edit Lol, well I finally got it open in the built in browser, but I'm not sure I'd say it works, exactly. My TV crashed, and based on the browser's behavior, I think it's less the website and more the browser. I may be better off just moving some photos with a USB drive.
In interviews, I would ask, "What makes an API RESTful?" and wait gleefully for them to stutter and stumble towards an answer.
I would accept any kind of answer, and it was only really a mark against you if you couldn't dredge up something about "resources" or "HTTP verbs," or even just express some kind of awareness that there were other kinds of API.
It wasn't unusual for someone to just have no clue.
Maybe that makes me a grammar nazi or a*, and maybe adding that was just a way for kids with one internship under their belt to pad their experience, but I always felt like you should know the words on your resume.
I guess now that I know about this "hypermedia" requirement, I should be a little more forgiving?