I can't tell if this question is intended to be a joke or not, but either way i'm in support of it.

Where's the flush method?

It could be useful for solving the Urinal Problem:

http://people.scs.carleton.ca/~kranakis/Papers/urinal.pdf

It was amusing when my government teacher explained the urinal problem to women in the class in a discussion on "man laws." He first asked where they would go in a four, urinal situation if there was nobody present, a person at urinal 1, and people at 1 and 3. The men and women had very, different answers that were pretty consistent within each gender. The women always asked, "Well what do you do if 1 and 3 are taken if 2 and 4 aren't an option?" Every guy but me effectively said, "Try not to piss yourself until 1 or 3 become available."

"Nick, you aren't weirded out by people sneaking a peek?"

"Nah, my protocol is different. It recognizes root cause is them looking at what they don't need to. If I notice this, I'll simply remind them they should turn away from me before I turn something toward them. Not my eyes either. Most rational and irrational people will avoid that outcome to maintain what dignity they can when exiting a bathroom."

The guys got a kick out of that solution but chose not to upgrade their protocol. Their loss. ;)

I hear it starts out strong but once your code reaches an advanced age it starts to putter out.

I didn't see anything in the manual about streams. If they do, I'm sure they'll be fine as long as you don't cross them.

Some say, streams are difficult to produce.

Only if another stream producer is in close proximity.