maker1138
Suppose we had started out with the command UI that gitless has and someone came along and tried to sell us the current git cli UI. It would be completely ridiculed.
The only thing possibly questionable about the gitless interface is that it does away with staging. However, you can always fall back to git for staging functionality if you like, and use gitless for most other commands. I think it is a win.
All of this is to support salaries of around $125k - $150k.
The same goes for pretty much any employer. If a fast food restaurant hires someone at $8/hr, it actually costs them around $16/hr to hire the employee.
In a free market Let's Encrypt could probably cut its expenses to close to half what it's at now.
His argument has nothing to do with caching or prefetching, etc.
First, it's about random access. You can't prefetch a random fetch!
Second, he's measuring time, a perfectly valid thing to do. And the reality is when you lay your memory cells out in 2 dimensions it takes order of sqrt(n) time to fetch a random memory cell value, where n is the number of memory cells you're using.
Third, it turns out order of sqrt(n) time is the best you can do even if you had the best technology in the universe.
Increased employee costs make an employer less likely to take risks and produce pressure to hire less workers. Then a few workers gain at the expense of others not having a job at all. Why do you hate workers?
Doing programming in plain English would be just as cumbersome as doing math in plain English.
I don't think anyone can quite fully imagine the nightmare of trying to program in a recursively enumerable language[1].
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140416/04183626928/paten...
It's humorous that they trot out the definition of innovation: "make changes in something established, especially by introducing new methods, ideas or products" A patent explicitly forbids you to make changes on something already established. Want to make an innovation on a processor that already exists? Sorry, patent! You'll have to wait nearly 2 decades to make your innovation.
Plus it just doesn't pass the smell test. They're basically claiming that if companies spent billions of more dollars on innovation instead of patent litigation we would have less innovation!?
The j-core open processor and RISC-V instruction set are only possible because of patents that expired. Imagine what web development would be like if someone had patented using xmlhttprequest to update the DOM and info in the DOM. Would innovation have increased or lagged?
Patents quite literally create monopolies. If monopolies are so good, why does anti-trust exist? I think it's quite obvious that patents stifle innovation. Oh yes, they may provide a legal method for people to rent-seek, and make lots of money through extraction, but they definitely slow the rate of innovation.
If only people would learn that its socialistic policies that make the rich richer and the poor poorer! Capitalism (voluntary trade and respect for private property) has always improved everyone's lives. What we need is a transition to more capitalism not less of it. If we keep implementing leftist policies that sound nice (like min wage, 'free' education, 'free' healthcare, etc) we'll end up poor like all the other socialist countries before us. It's time to actually have compassion on the poor and create opportunities through capitalism.
[1] http://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/hanke-k...
Innovation comes through competition, not monopoly. Ideally, we'd eliminate patents and copyrights altogether, but as a compromise, I think having terms of 3 years, with no renewals, is fair. That way a business can capitalize on what it creates and get a 3 year head start on competition, but you still get competition fairly soon which benefits consumers.
That's one of the biggest problems with society today. People need to learn to grow up.
http://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/working...
Other top items would be transportation and taxes. A $10k safe and energy efficient vehicle would be a great first step.
Though it may be unpopular in some circles, the fact is taxation is one of the least efficient ways of allocating capital. You have administration costs, fraud, waste, and abuse. If we lower the cost of living for everyone, we can lower taxes as well and allow that capital to be invested more efficiently.
Now that we have so many pixels to push, graphics acceleration has become a key part of the computer, and apple's offerings are anemic at best on mbp.
OS X has also become much more "walled garden"-like and fisher price feeling. With every release they become less developer friendly.
I'm moving to Linux as much as I can and when I finally had to get new hardware, I got the top of the line Inspiron 7559 and replaced the hd with an ssd. It's better than any mbp hardware you can buy today (with the exception of the trackpad. Apple cannot be beat with that!) at half the cost!
http://www.dell.com/en-us/shop/productdetails/inspiron-15-75...
Developers are why Apple was successful in the first place, I hope they start making serious tools again instead of toys.
Seriously. I'm tired of these people focusing only on skin color. Why don't we let it go, forget about skin color, and live together.