News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:History of Xenix – Microsoft's Forgotten Unix-Based Opera... by pmontra on Friday October 07, 2016 @10:40AM (#12660997)
> Even though it came first, Unix was probably more powerful than MS-DOS.

This is the understatement of the decade. Of course it was more powerful. I used Xenix in 1987 on an IBM PC, probably a 80286. It was a Xenix/MS-DOS dual booting system. Multiuser and multitasking with Xenix or single user and monotask with MS-DOS.

I used various flavors of Unix on Z8000 or 68k architectures in those years. All of them were obviously better than MS-DOS.

Re:History of Xenix – Microsoft's Forgotten Unix-Based Opera... by Koshkin on Friday October 07, 2016 @06:46PM (#12664528)
> obviously better

What is better critically depends on the "coordinate system". There was (and still is) something infinitely precious about MS-DOS. Simplicity, ease of accessing hardware, and all that alongside the vast multitude of extremely powerful and useful software that was available for it. In other words, DOS had something that few, if any, other OS could offer at the time.

Re:History of Xenix – Microsoft's Forgotten Unix-Based Opera... by sxcurry on Friday October 07, 2016 @01:55PM (#12662583)
The entire article is incoherent.
Re:History of Xenix – Microsoft's Forgotten Unix-Based Opera... by gravypod on Friday October 07, 2016 @03:37PM (#12663372)
Hey I know this is super off topic but can you please email me? I'm in the process of fixing an old computer (an i486 'portable' system) and I need to find some stuff to get it up and running. I'm looking for someone who can point me to where I can find a bootable 5 1/4 drive to see if my IO card is good. I have asked a few professors at my college but all of them have cleaned out their old hardware.

I know this may be strange but there aren't many people left that can debug these kinds of systems. Sorry for disturbing this thread!

Re:History of Xenix – Microsoft's Forgotten Unix-Based Opera... by pmontra on Friday October 07, 2016 @04:59PM (#12663858)
Those computers I wrote about are gone a long time ago. I don't know where to look for those components. Maybe ebay?
Re:History of Xenix – Microsoft's Forgotten Unix-Based Opera... by gravypod on Friday October 07, 2016 @05:50PM (#12664176)
I've looked, nothing bootable sadly. I hope some day someone sees this message and emails me. I'd be willing to pay at least 10 bucks + shipping for a DOS image or something.
Re:History of Xenix – Microsoft's Forgotten Unix-Based Opera... by hexscrews on Friday October 07, 2016 @06:15PM (#12664325)
Not sure if this will help any. http://www.emsps.com/oldtools/msdos.htm I also read about using a CF to IDE adapter. http://www.yqcomputer.com/1118_467_1.htm
Re:History of Xenix – Microsoft's Forgotten Unix-Based Opera... by gravypod on Saturday October 08, 2016 @12:16AM (#12665642)
I could make the image provided I had both a 5 1/4 floppy drive and an actual 5 1/4 floppy. I don't have either of those for my new computers.

It's like trying to write a DVD with no burner. Where do you have a computer that still has a DVD drive burner? Same problem I'm having.

Re:History of Xenix – Microsoft's Forgotten Unix-Based Opera... by pmontra on Saturday October 08, 2016 @03:29AM (#12666047)
My laptop came with a DVD burner a couple of years ago. Maybe used once. I swapped it with a 1 TB SSD earlier this year but I can connect it with USB if I have to.
Re:History of Xenix – Microsoft's Forgotten Unix-Based Opera... by digi_owl on Sunday October 09, 2016 @02:49PM (#12672700)
A 486 with a 5.25 drive? that's an odd combo to put it mildly.
Re:History of Xenix – Microsoft's Forgotten Unix-Based Opera... by jack_rabbit on Friday October 07, 2016 @01:36PM (#12662423)
You beat me to it. I was just about to point out that ridiculous sentence.