Re:Epiphany-V: A 1024-core 64-bit RISC processor
by vardump on Thursday October 06, 2016 @08:16AM
(#12651774)
So what can we count on?
In a tile based CPU error topology matters. A string of broken cores or a broken core at the edges is likely worse than a broken core with all 4 (or 8?) neighbors working.
Re:Epiphany-V: A 1024-core 64-bit RISC processor
by adapteva on Thursday October 06, 2016 @06:03PM
(#12656514)
Impossible to characterize without high volume silicon or accurate yield models. We can say that historically, most failures are in SRAM cells and they are limited to a few bits (core still works!) and that in general only one out of N cores will fail. For arguments sake, let's assume the while network always works, but 1 CPU may be broken. (this is what needs to be confirmed later). Does that help?
Not saying we won't have chips with all cores working, just saying you shouldn't count on it.