News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Amazon’s Ambition to Compete Directly with UPS and FedEx by xutopia on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @02:53PM (#12600244)
Is anyone concerned with Amazon taking over too many things? It's already killing smaller shops... I understand why but it's now trying to take over content and all forms of shipping? I'm worried we'll have a single mega store one day from which we buy all our things.
Re:Amazon’s Ambition to Compete Directly with UPS and FedEx by rgbrenner on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @03:00PM (#12600289)
Amazon is growing quickly, and entering more markets..

but there's no reason to be alarmed. Amazon really isn't as big as they look. Revenue last year: $107B

Compare that to other things: About 1/5th of Walmart. 2/3rds of CVS. 10% less than Costco. 1/3rd more than Target. 15% more than Home Depot. Sure they're #1 in ecommerce, but ecommerce is only 16% of retail sales in the US.

There are actually quite a few companies the size of Amazon. And many of those companies are actually more profitable than Amazon too.

Re:Amazon’s Ambition to Compete Directly with UPS and FedEx by cosmoharrigan on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @03:09PM (#12600369)
Units from third party (3P) sellers made up 49% of total units in Q2 2016, and Amazon only reports their commission as revenue for 3P sales rather than the total gross merchandise volume (GMV). A better comparison point is thus GMV, which was estimated at $225B for 2015[1], compared to $482B for Walmart.

[1] http://www.channeladvisor.com/blog/?pn=scot/deep-dive-into-a...

Re:Amazon’s Ambition to Compete Directly with UPS and FedEx by swalsh on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @04:26PM (#12601054)
Millenials and those younger than them prefer eCommerce. Combine that with increasingly better service, and the trend of it increasing will continue. There's a reason Walmart bought jet.com. eCommerce is important, and they sucked at it.
Re:Amazon’s Ambition to Compete Directly with UPS and FedEx by shambala on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @04:30PM (#12601099)
And Walmart will still suck at eCommerce, even after buying jet.com. That purchase was a blunder.
Re:Amazon’s Ambition to Compete Directly with UPS and FedEx by bdcravens on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @03:18PM (#12600461)
> It's already killing smaller shops

Nothing new. Blockbuster killed small video rentals, Barnes and Noble killed small bookstores, Walgreens/CVS killed small drug stores, and WalMart killed a number of store types.

Re:Amazon’s Ambition to Compete Directly with UPS and FedEx by j2bax on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @04:56PM (#12601307)
And then Netflix killed Blockbuster and Amazon killed Barnes and Noble (well almost)... So the cycle continues! Just when you think nothing can uproot a company, something more innovative/convenient comes along.
Re:Amazon’s Ambition to Compete Directly with UPS and FedEx by gigatexal on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @02:56PM (#12600264)
No, I don't have any qualms with this. I just want quality stuff at the cheapest prices. Smaller shops will serve niches that Amazon doesn't.
Re:Amazon’s Ambition to Compete Directly with UPS and FedEx by jerf on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @03:14PM (#12600424)
"Smaller shops will serve niches that Amazon doesn't."

To be honest, my experience is rather the other way around... I expect Amazon to have the stuff my local shops don't.

Re:Amazon’s Ambition to Compete Directly with UPS and FedEx by cgag on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @03:28PM (#12600537)
If I'm going to a brick and mortar store it's generally out of desperation and quick need, knowing I'll be forced to buy low quality crap for bad prices.
Re:Amazon’s Ambition to Compete Directly with UPS and FedEx by freehunter on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @04:10PM (#12600899)
Walgreens or Walmart, yes. But there are plenty of tiny shops around town that have handmade stuff or quality merchandise that you can't get on Amazon. I know I wouldn't buy a solid-wood antique furniture set from Amazon, for example.
Re:Amazon’s Ambition to Compete Directly with UPS and FedEx by Grishnakh on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @05:23PM (#12601480)
He's not talking about small brick-and-mortar shops, he's talking about small web shops. There's tons of specialty web shops that have stuff you won't find on Amazon (or worse, as I found recently with the Litter-Robot litter box I was looking at, it's available on Amazon for 3x as much as it costs from the manufacturer, because the Amazon seller is a scammer that just buys the item and ships to your address and pockets the difference).
Re:Amazon’s Ambition to Compete Directly with UPS and FedEx by clock_tower on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @03:00PM (#12600292)
"Quality stuff at the cheapest prices" is how we got into this corporate-oligarchy mess in the first place...
Re:Amazon’s Ambition to Compete Directly with UPS and FedEx by ci5er on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @06:05PM (#12601722)
You expect consumers to pick crappier stuff, at higher prices and more inconvenience?

Or that the companies who provide better/faster/cheaper not to grow large on providing what the people want at the prices they want to pay?

Re:Amazon’s Ambition to Compete Directly with UPS and FedEx by monksy on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @03:10PM (#12600383)
> I just want quality stuff at the cheapest prices.

Which Amazon has been spammed by chinese dropshippers.

> cheapest prices

Not always. Depends what you're looking for.

Re:Amazon’s Ambition to Compete Directly with UPS and FedEx by tracker1 on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @03:16PM (#12600447)
Yeah, and it's really annoying when you're looking for certain items that have many generics.
Re:Amazon’s Ambition to Compete Directly with UPS and FedEx by bitJericho on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @03:51PM (#12600750)
Item for item, I find eBay buy it now prices at least 10 percent cheaper.
Re:Amazon’s Ambition to Compete Directly with UPS and FedEx by xemdetia on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @03:11PM (#12600392)
Most of the places where Amazon is painting over still requires people to make cool stuff and let people buy cool stuff for their web storefront, EC2 and other enterprises. They have a vested interest in the economy itself working well, and most of the things they are participating in are in race-to-the-bottom sort of scenarios.

I find that smaller unique shops still have a huge edge, it's just the medium to large shops that are losing. I still would rather a world with lots of small people making good money selling unique goods via post/internet then a huge segment of the population just punching the clock at minimum wage.

Re:Amazon’s Ambition to Compete Directly with UPS and FedEx by rb808 on Wednesday September 28, 2016 @03:12PM (#12600398)
Buy n Large is here!