News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The OPM Data Breach [pdf]. Parent comment

Re:The OPM Data Breach [pdf] by jessaustin on Thursday September 08, 2016 @08:30PM (#12458773)
Yes the minority members of a committee can issue their own reports, e.g. [0]. It probably won't happen in this case because the "other" party just wants this issue to go away. Arguing in public would only draw attention.

[0] http://democrats-benghazi.house.gov/sites/democrats.benghazi...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The OPM Data Breach [pdf] by meepmorp on Thursday September 08, 2016 @08:54PM (#12458892)
> It probably won't happen in this case because the "other" party just wants this issue to go away. Arguing in public would only draw attention.

From tptacek's comment, made ~5 minutes before yours:

http://democrats.oversight.house.gov/news/press-releases/cum...

Why would they want to avoid discussing this?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The OPM Data Breach [pdf] by jessaustin on Thursday September 08, 2016 @09:51PM (#12459149)
That looks like a different thing? I.e. a "memo" prepared by "staff"?

Nevertheless I'm sorry to have made a comment that seemed partisan. The Democrats and Republicans can both jump in a lake for all I care.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The OPM Data Breach [pdf] by tptacek on Friday September 09, 2016 @09:19AM (#12461856)
No, it's the response of the ranking minority member of the committee that produced the report we're all commenting on. It's right there in the title.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The OPM Data Breach [pdf] by meepmorp on Sunday September 11, 2016 @11:40AM (#12473871)
> Nevertheless I'm sorry to have made a comment that seemed partisan.

I'm interested in figuring out what you mean by your remark. You're saying nobody wanted to talk about it, but it seems for opposite is the case. What prompted your original remark?

[ Parent | on HN ]