Re:The Math Myth
by rrtwo on Saturday September 03, 2016 @08:52AM
(#12419002)
What is the generalised rule/case where small sample sizes are sufficient?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
If the difference between samples is VERY large, you don't need a very large sample size.
In other words, we're trying to find the chance that the result we got was due to chance. Let's say you have numbers like these:
A: 11, 11, 12, 12, 13, 13, 13, 13, 13, 13, 14, 15 B: 90, 92, 93, 94, 94, 95, 95, 96, 97, 99, 99, 101, 101
What is the chance that those two samples come from the same distribution?
On the other hand, if A averaged something like 12.5 and B averaged something like 12.4 it would require a huge sample size to prove that those two samples come from two different distributions.
Re:The Math Myth
by dredmorbius on Saturday September 03, 2016 @09:36AM
(#12419139)
That sounds intuitively reasonable. Is there a cononical reference argument that you're aware of?
I'm really talking about https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-value
Most people just look at the number of subjects in a study, but not the p-values
Re:The Math Myth
by dredmorbius on Saturday September 03, 2016 @11:43AM
(#12419613)
Thanks.
Re:The Math Myth
by GFK_of_xmaspast on Saturday September 03, 2016 @11:23AM
(#12419520)
See also "statistical power" : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_power
Depends on what effect size or power you are looking for and/or other factors like variance in the data (standard deviation), etc. There are some different ways to calculate sample sizes here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sample_size_determination
or google: sample size calculator