News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Play along with NSA: The RAFTER unintentional radio emiss... by Someone1234 on Monday August 29, 2016 @10:44AM (#12382157)
> For some reason, the BBC has decided that either adding a login system or monitoring IP addresses that connect to iPlayer is not the way to go and their official line is that they will continue to monitor usage in the same way as they currently do.

Because it is completely impractical.

TV licenses are per property, not per person, so all that would happen is that people would register accounts at a friend's property and keep streaming.

IPs aren't tied to specific subscribers, and giving out a database of IPs to subscriber addresses would be a huge breach of privacy (as advertisers can use it also).

Plus, frankly, the majority of people pay for their TV licenses and this system would just frustrate legal owners. You'd be deploying a system that may impact less than 5% of viewers, doubt it would even pay for itself.

Re:Play along with NSA: The RAFTER unintentional radio emiss... by JupiterMoon on Monday August 29, 2016 @02:02PM (#12383785)
Has the snoopers charter gone through yet? Once ISPs are forced to store usage logs it is only a matter of time before TV licensing start attempting to get hold of logs for enforcement purposes.
Re:Play along with NSA: The RAFTER unintentional radio emiss... by kelnage on Monday August 29, 2016 @02:19PM (#12383927)
Does that balance the rights of the 5% who don't watch live TV but have license officers peering through their windows or (potentially) using detector vans to look through their walls to see what they're watching?

I agree neither are perfect (or maybe even good) solutions, but it's still a trade off somehow.

Re:Play along with NSA: The RAFTER unintentional radio emiss... by monocasa on Monday August 29, 2016 @02:44PM (#12384158)
> IPs aren't tied to specific subscribers, and giving out a database of IPs to subscriber addresses would be a huge breach of privacy (as advertisers can use it also).

Would that really stop BT? Or do you think that they wouldn't without getting paid first?