News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Why bad scientific code beats code following “best practices” (2014). Parent comment

Re:Why bad scientific code beats code following “best practi... by pjmlp on Sunday August 28, 2016 @02:01PM (#12377568)
In the commercial world, specially at enterprise level, coders are only allowed to follow beautiful designs of UML layers created by business analysts, solution architects that haven't written a single line of code in the last 15 years.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why bad scientific code beats code following “best practi... by quotemstr on Sunday August 28, 2016 @02:10PM (#12377634)
Do places like that actually still exist?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why bad scientific code beats code following “best practi... by quantumhobbit on Sunday August 28, 2016 @02:52PM (#12377865)
Yes, but now the business analysts and architects call themselves scrum masters and product owners.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why bad scientific code beats code following “best practi... by pjmlp on Sunday August 28, 2016 @03:05PM (#12377938)
Yes, lots of them specially at DAX level in projects with offshoring components.
[ Parent | on HN ]