News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Browsing your website does not mean I want your spam. Parent comment

Re:Browsing your website does not mean I want your spam by zer0gravity on Tuesday August 23, 2016 @02:00AM (#12341711)
> There is no core privacy premise of the internet, and certainly not one that everybody used it signed up for.

Sure there isn't. The internet is just a jungle where predatory animals can hunt you down if you go in their teritory.

They say we've exited from the jungle once, but apparently the jungle is still in us.

Besides ad blockers, we need more plugins to help us mark these animals and keep us away from them.

A nice plugin would be to just remove from your searches all the links to domains known to be involved in spam.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Browsing your website does not mean I want your spam by yeknap on Tuesday August 23, 2016 @02:17AM (#12341758)
At this point a plugin probably isn't enough. We need a better browser that gets back to the document viewing roots. Something better than NoScript that has a rough idea of the types of transforms a domain's JS performs so that it can serve me the "page" w/out running suspicious code. Although I suspect this would just start a new style arms race of obfuscation similar to adblock, etc.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Browsing your website does not mean I want your spam by amelius on Tuesday August 23, 2016 @03:20AM (#12341954)
> Although I suspect this would just start a new style arms race of obfuscation similar to adblock, etc.

We could use AI to detect and remove ads, perhaps combined with collaborative filtering.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Browsing your website does not mean I want your spam by timlyo on Tuesday August 23, 2016 @04:04AM (#12342104)
And what would the advertisers do next?

That would just further the arms race.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Browsing your website does not mean I want your spam by amelius on Tuesday August 23, 2016 @05:06AM (#12342325)
I don't think so. If a really smart AI cannot detect the ad, why would a user be able to consciously detect it?

AI will perhaps push ads into the subconscious space. But an arms race will make ads more and more subconscious, until they basically disappear.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Browsing your website does not mean I want your spam by Terr_ on Tuesday August 23, 2016 @06:32AM (#12342623)
Well... So what? I mean, just because an arms-race exists doesn't mean participation is futile or counterproductive.

("But Thog, bigger sharp stick will just mean angrier dangercat. Is club race. Why ever do?")

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Browsing your website does not mean I want your spam by zer0gravity on Tuesday August 23, 2016 @02:26AM (#12341794)
> Although I suspect this would just start a new style arms race of obfuscation similar to adblock, etc.

Then so be it. Apparently life is an arms race..

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Browsing your website does not mean I want your spam by kristianc on Tuesday August 23, 2016 @03:29AM (#12341985)
This works really well for me, and avoids the overhead of using a browser plugin: https://github.com/StevenBlack/hosts
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Browsing your website does not mean I want your spam by anc84 on Tuesday August 23, 2016 @05:27AM (#12342417)
hosts file blocking will never be as good and complete as add-on based blocking. You cannot block on DOM, you cannot block specific things from a host but let through others, etc. Not to mention that it is much harder to toggle if you need to.
[ Parent | on HN ]