Re:Ask HN: Is it possible to run your own mail server for pe...
by robertely on Sunday August 14, 2016 @12:34AM
(#12284275)
That's why you soft bounce. It tells the sender that you can't receive the email _at this time_.
Re:Ask HN: Is it possible to run your own mail server for pe...
by philtar on Sunday August 14, 2016 @04:37AM
(#12284805)
Pretty sure you can't do anything when you're not connected to the internet.
Re:Ask HN: Is it possible to run your own mail server for pe...
by sbierwagen on Sunday August 14, 2016 @03:20PM
(#12286892)
A connection timeout is a soft bounce.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5321#section-4.5.4.1
The sender MUST delay retrying a particular destination after one
attempt has failed. In general, the retry interval SHOULD be at
least 30 minutes; however, more sophisticated and variable strategies
will be beneficial when the SMTP client can determine the reason for
non-delivery.
Retries continue until the message is transmitted or the sender gives
up; the give-up time generally needs to be at least 4-5 days. It MAY
be appropriate to set a shorter maximum number of retries for non-
delivery notifications and equivalent error messages than for
standard messages. The parameters to the retry algorithm MUST be
configurable.
Re:Ask HN: Is it possible to run your own mail server for pe...
by bigp3t3 on Sunday August 14, 2016 @09:12AM
(#12285443)
That's why sending mta's should resend. Think sendmail does this every few hours or so
Re:Ask HN: Is it possible to run your own mail server for pe...
by OJFord on Sunday August 14, 2016 @01:32PM
(#12286458)
Ha, I wrote that so cautiously, thinking "I'm sure this terminology's not right, I'll probably be called out on it"!
Thanks though, I learned something :)
Regardless of what we call it - the sender would get a copy back with a message not containing the word 'bounce' that says it failed to send, right?
Mail was written to be resilient against network downtime.