* cause people not to travel at all, thus keeping money in their pockets rather than spending it to benefit the economy
* cause people who do not live in the city to drive to other places--places where their preferred mode of transportation is accommodated--to work or transact business
* cause people who live in the city to leave due to increasing frustration with their inability to go where they wish.
* causes people to not travel far away and to spend their money in the local economy
* cause an increase in people using public transport to get into the city because it is now a nice experience inside the city
* increase the health of individuals that are walking more and breathing less pollution thus making the city a more desirable place to live
* revitalise local businesses in each area leading to a more diverse stronger local business
* increase the amount people spend because they're walking past shops rather than driving past them and ignoring them
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disappearing_traffic https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smeed's_law
It is almost certainly less than triple, because of latent demand.
The people living on the interior of the superblocks will enjoy a more peaceful car-free environment, but the people overlooking the through-streets will experience more noise, pollution and congestion.
I wonder how Barcelona plans to compensate the residents of through-streets for the newly introduced inconvenience (and predictably lowered real-estate value with respect to their neighbours).