News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why we got brilliant engineers for only 2,000$ / year by jimbokun on Saturday March 27, 2010 @02:49PM (#1223408)
Capitalism in a nut shell. For a few hundred dollars, you can get a computer with software installed that together cost billions of dollars to develop over the years. For free, you can find almost any information on earth with a search engine that also cost many millions of dollars to develop.

The only thing that stands out here is that by using the products of companies just getting started, you get to influence the development process to suit your needs.

Re:Why we got brilliant engineers for only 2,000$ / year by wallflower on Saturday March 27, 2010 @03:40PM (#1223499)
The classic essay: "I, Pencil"

"I am a lead pencil—the ordinary wooden pencil familiar to all boys and girls and adults who can read and write.

Writing is both my vocation and my avocation; that’s all I do.

You may wonder why I should write a genealogy..."

http://www.thefreemanonline.org/featured/i-pencil/

Re:Why we got brilliant engineers for only 2,000$ / year by joe_the_user on Saturday March 27, 2010 @05:00PM (#1223664)
The three hundred dollars I spent on my laptop is combined with the money of millions of others to give Intel a hefty profit.

The $2000/year these folks spend on their engineers is combined with what?

So the question is how sustainable is a model like this? For example, do they really expect support two years from now? Perhaps they won't need it or can do that in-house. Still...

"They get a paying customer and improve their offering. But I still feel a little bad. Because I know that most of them will never makeup for the time and heart they invested"

Re:Why we got brilliant engineers for only 2,000$ / year by nezumi on Saturday March 27, 2010 @04:18PM (#1223577)
Is there anywhere we can get information about the failures, to try and get a balanced view? Is it time for another communal spreadsheet?
Re:Why we got brilliant engineers for only 2,000$ / year by rphlx on Saturday March 27, 2010 @02:48PM (#1223403)
Great idea, until they starve to death once you depend on them.
Re:Why we got brilliant engineers for only 2,000$ / year by hartror on Saturday March 27, 2010 @07:45PM (#1223923)
Dammit you're right I should get working on that search engine before Google goes out of business!!!!
Re:Why we got brilliant engineers for only 2,000$ / year by wangwei on Saturday March 27, 2010 @01:57PM (#1223314)
I think he has a good point. Paul Graham and YC make it seem like creating a successful startup is easier than it may be. In reality, only a few succeed and the majority just fail miserably. But since we only hear success stories, it makes it seem more often than it is.
Re:Why we got brilliant engineers for only 2,000$ / year by ryanelkins on Saturday March 27, 2010 @02:35PM (#1223375)
Of course, this only really works if these small, willing to do anything for a customer, struggling companies stay in business. As these entrepreneurs fail to realize the return on their time/monetary investments, their enthusiasm may wane and the features will slow or stop, and the project may eventually just stagnate or get shut down. I guess it's good while it lasts, but make sure you have backup plans.
Re:Why we got brilliant engineers for only 2,000$ / year by wdewind on Saturday March 27, 2010 @01:31PM (#1223271)
Isn't he just saying SaaS?
Re:Why we got brilliant engineers for only 2,000$ / year by meterplech on Saturday March 27, 2010 @01:34PM (#1223278)
Yeah, but he is showing how easy it is to leverage it for your own small business
Re:Why we got brilliant engineers for only 2,000$ / year by Psyonic on Saturday March 27, 2010 @12:51PM (#1223208)
Good stuff. He shouldn't feel too bad though, because he is giving them feedback on what at least one customer wants, which could easily be what many customers want, and help them succeed in the long run.
Re:Why we got brilliant engineers for only 2,000$ / year by jbscpa on Saturday March 27, 2010 @02:27PM (#1223357)
yea,

It is like his website is out of toner.

Re:Why we got brilliant engineers for only 2,000$ / year by vegai on Sunday March 28, 2010 @11:16AM (#1224702)
No, you do not get brilliant engineers or engineers at all for that price.

Thing is, perhaps most things don't need engineers.

Re:Why we got brilliant engineers for only 2,000$ / year by pinksoda on Saturday March 27, 2010 @01:37PM (#1223283)
His font / size hurts my eyes.
Re:Why we got brilliant engineers for only 2,000$ / year by kowen on Saturday March 27, 2010 @02:26PM (#1223355)
Have you tried the readability bookmarklet? http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=501970