vegai
vegai on Hacker News
There has already been a vastly simpler system that predates OS X: Linux or BSD combined with X11 and an arbitrary window manager. Just stay away from anything that calls itself a "desktop environment" and you should be fine.
Personal recommendation: http://www.archlinux.org & http://awesome.naquadah.org/ -- a nice compromise between easy configurability and the "suckless" simplicity mentality.
Anyone buying that would be a complete idiot.
So yes, it might work.
But... nobody can guarantee that. Have you never used paid software?
I mean sure, I can take your money. I can promise you things. So what?
And why the hell was I downmodded for asking a legit question? Is this place falling into reddit land?
Why do you insist on paying for a free thing?
Some light at the end of the tunnel: Russia decided to scrap the whole system this year! I hope they will stick with that absolutely brilliant decision.
No, all of them had, and most still do. People don't seem to realize how freaking old and complicated those things are.
Macs have the same problem. You can't get a mac without OS X.
All the commercial DBs have similar issues. Just deal with them and go on.
He capitalized on the idea that the consumer is not allowed to choose the operating system of the computer they buy. That idea hasn't yet faded.
That's why I hate Microsoft.
Linux (the kernel) actually has manpages? Are you sure? I've never seen any.
Case in point: check the output of lsmod. How many of those modules have a corresponding manpage? My guess: zero.
Same question for a BSD system (with lsmod changed to kldstat or whatever): all of them.
Come on, it's the Basic of this decade.
Cheap more probably equals unskilled. That's all it boils down to.
Posted by
vegai on Wednesday October 26, 2011 @10:25AM
from the thisismynext.com dept.
Whoa.
Might there be an inkling of a hope that they'll go in with this one?
Oh right. Good point.
Let me rephrase what I really feel: After my three previous Nokia phones, I don't feel Nokia is a viable producer of high quality phones. In fact, part of me wants to punish them for selling me such junk and enveloping me in some sort of cognitive dissonance field that made me think they were doing good work.
Then again, Elop got there to change exactly that, so perhaps I should give them a benefit of doubt now.
Yeah, I guess... I really don't regard Symbian as a viable platform, though
Is anyone doing high quality non-smart phones anymore? I'm looking for something that's small, sturdy with long battery life. Preferably with good music playing.
I suppose Sony Ericssons's non-android phones are pretty good in that space, are there any others?
Hmm, time to move to cash or bitcoin?
It's frightening how cars' software is bloating up. I would've thought that a product that very easily kills people if things go wrong would have been under more scrutiny.
Smart people go to college but they don't know what they want yet. If they find out and make it before they graduate, they drop out, because it would be an incredible waste of time to do otherwise.
And then I would be paying extra for the OS X that I never use. Same problem, really.
You can install Linux on it, though, which can be superiour to OS X. On the other hand, it's a very irritating that one is forced to buying an OS that one is never going to use on the machine.
They're just fricking phones, why do we care so much about this?
Well, some people simply don't prefer OS X and are a bit reluctant to pay for it.
Looks great! Is it still a hostage to Microsoft?
>Billions of successful projects run on Java.
I will give you billion dollars if you can prove that.
My personal guess (using my personal metrics) is that there are 10^3 to 10^4 successful Java projects and 10^9 failed ones.
One of the lessons: Do not use Java for production applications.