Re:The almost-magical "content aware fill" plugin from a few...
by aidenn0 on Friday March 26, 2010 @07:57PM
(#1222308)
Not nearly as good as what the photoshop demo did. In particular, the photoshop demo had examples of content aware fill with shadows moving through the object to be removed. In this example you can see the line/shadow of the overhang being eliminated with the purse. Maybe the photoshop fill would have done the same and they just cherry-picked some examples, but right now I'm thinking it's just better.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The almost-magical "content aware fill" plugin from a few...
by jerf on Friday March 26, 2010 @08:10PM
(#1222322)
It's hard to tell, because unless you had access to a different video than I did you can't really see what Photoshop did, even after bumping it up to 480p. In this case I think we have the raw files, so you have the chance to examine the results up close and personal. It's not a direct comparison.
Re:The almost-magical "content aware fill" plugin from a few...
by Batsu on Friday March 26, 2010 @08:31PM
(#1222362)
Indeed, if there ever was a problem with true verification, it is the requirement that you have to do it yourself without anyone involved in the steps.
Re:The almost-magical "content aware fill" plugin from a few...
by wazoox on Saturday March 27, 2010 @07:16AM
(#1222853)
Even if it's only 75% as good, it's 1° free 2° free 3° free so it doesn't cost any money, and you can adapt it / enhance it. So it beats photoshop hands down easily.
Re:The almost-magical "content aware fill" plugin from a few...
by Qz on Friday March 26, 2010 @08:39PM
(#1222370)
Agreed -- when the trash is removed in the GIMP plugin, you can see that the line on the wall vanishes too -- the CS5 version seems like it would have extended it.