News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why don't companies use FreeBSD as much in production as ... by redbeard0x0a on Sunday July 31, 2016 @08:39PM (#12199619)
How is Linux more portable than BSD?! NetBSD has been ported to nearly every platform known to man, even toasters.

I'm surprised that more embedded devices don't run some sort of BSD because they wouldn't have to release code. The PS4's OS is FreeBSD, which they did release a lot of code in return, but they don't have to open source or release all their code (i.e. DRM and other "Security" based stuff) if they don't want to.

Re:Why don't companies use FreeBSD as much in production as ... by vacri on Sunday July 31, 2016 @08:54PM (#12199657)
There's platform, and then there's drivers. There's no point on having an OS on a net-enabled device if that OS can't talk to the network hardware, for example.

Linux has had a ridiculous amount of work from a variety of sources in it's drivers. I once used a git animation tool (forget the name of it, sorry) on the linux kernel source, and the area where the drivers were put was buzzing like a beehive, as people from all sorts of companies were making sure their stuff was supported on linux.

Re:Why don't companies use FreeBSD as much in production as ... by iotku on Sunday July 31, 2016 @09:04PM (#12199674)
>I once used a git animation tool (forget the name of it, sorry)

Probably Gource I would imagine http://gource.io/

Re:Why don't companies use FreeBSD as much in production as ... by vacri on Sunday July 31, 2016 @09:51PM (#12199804)
That's the one, thank you.
Re:Why don't companies use FreeBSD as much in production as ... by Risthel on Monday August 08, 2016 @07:08AM (#12246784)
> The PS4's OS is FreeBSD, which they did release a lot of code in return, but they don't have to open source or > release all their code (i.e. DRM and other "Security" based stuff) if they don't want to.

And that is a 2-way road, where some people cry on forums and maillists anyway, that companies tend to use BSD and not return to community. There is no need to paint it as a win-win situation(distribute proprietary derivate software) when it clearly has its problems too.

Re:Why don't companies use FreeBSD as much in production as ... by tracewpearson on Sunday July 31, 2016 @09:00PM (#12199665)
Many embedded Linux vendors don't release their code. They get away with it because many are only around for a short period and enforcement resources are limited.
Re:Why don't companies use FreeBSD as much in production as ... by pantalaimon on Sunday July 31, 2016 @10:16PM (#12199880)
> NetBSD has been ported to nearly every platform known to man, even toasters.

Linux runs on all these platforms and more - that toaster only had an ARM board sticked to it