News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Viral.js – Peer-to-peer web app distribution. Parent comment

Re:Viral.js – Peer-to-peer web app distribution by Touche on Friday July 29, 2016 @02:54PM (#12189028)
Why is this kind of trash the top comment on HN?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Viral.js – Peer-to-peer web app distribution by wybiral on Friday July 29, 2016 @05:05PM (#12189980)
I was going to try the demo if it weren't for the FB login (an unnecessary barrier for some people). The comment was meant as feedback.

Making your demo more accessible might help. I'm not sure how that's "trash".

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Viral.js – Peer-to-peer web app distribution by Touche on Monday August 01, 2016 @09:53AM (#12202348)
You shifted the focus away from the library to some implementation detail of the demo. If you didn't like the login feature of the demo you could have read about the library in the linked article or the GitHub page. Instead you chose to complain about something unrelated to the library itself.
[ Parent | on HN ]