> terminals which can take magnetic-strips are just super rare and usually not supported even if the machine has them.
I've not found this to be the case. I used a non-chip US card here in the UK extensively over the last year or so, and I've never once encountered a merchant that didn't want to take my card, nor a terminal that didn't read magnetic strips.
I do find people at checkouts to be a little surprised by someone having to swipe & sign, since that's quite rare now. And often they had trouble finding a pen for me to sign with :) But I was always able to complete the transaction nonetheless.
I can imagine a cashier just rolling their eyes at an American using a weird card, but being much more distrustful of a Polish person doing the same.
Contactless, no thanks, I don't want somebody to swipe my purse without me knowing and as far as I googled it's not clear that Faraday bags really work. Contactless passports too.
http://www.securityweek.com/contactless-visa-cards-vulnerabl...
> "With just a mobile phone we created a PoS terminal that could read a card through a wallet," said Martin Emms, lead researcher on the project. "All the checks are carried out on the card rather than the terminal so at the point of transaction, there is nothing to raise suspicions. By pre-setting the amount you want to transfer, you can bump your mobile against someone’s pocket or swipe your phone over a wallet left on a table and approve a transaction. In our tests, it took less than a second for the transaction to be approved."
Then, when you tried to use your legit card, the on-card transaction count would clash and the card and clones would be frozen. You, as the obvious owner of the card, would be free of all liabilty and due a refund (the bank would not kick up a fuss about this, it is in their interest to reduce friction in these low amount cases to drive technology adoption).
Before chip+pin (in Netherlands), swipe+pin was used. For fraud the client was already responsible. In practice the bank almost always reimbursed the client. To restrict the fraud/skimming, cards are often restricted to be used in Europe only. A setting you can easily change.
Due to above, usually non-European tourists are now affected by skimming.
I prefer the tap to pay btw. Banks restrict which machines can get money off these cards and in practice it is usually the typing in of your PIN which is the biggest problem. Depending on the bank you can change the max tap to pay amount.
Now the same situation in the UK - you report your card as stolen, the bank refunds you, but also takes the money away from the merchant(saying that the responsibility to check the signature was on them and they failed, so they lose the money). As a result, almost no one in UK accepts signature-only cards, because you could literally buy something, sign the receipt, walk out and report the card as stolen - and the merchant loses all the money. So merchants had all the incentive to upgrade their terminals to chip-and-pin only, terminals which can take magnetic-strips are just super rare and usually not supported even if the machine has them.
edit: it looks like signature fraud in US is not always on the bank. My mistake, sorry.