Re:My Venezuela Nightmare: A 30-Day Hunt for Food in a Starv...
by ktRolster on Monday July 18, 2016 @01:19PM
(#12116501)
Yeah, not totalitarian policies, just stupid policies. Genghis Khan could become dictator and if he fixed those policies, the economy would improve.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:My Venezuela Nightmare: A 30-Day Hunt for Food in a Starv...
by elliotec on Monday July 18, 2016 @01:25PM
(#12116559)
I always find it strange that Genghis Khan is used as an example this way. He was solely responsible for one of the largest economic revolutions in history by uniting the Silk Road, standardizing a writing system, and ran a meritocratic society. So yeah of course he could fix it, he's one of the most successful rulers of all time by all metrics.
Edit: Yeah, obviously he and his conquest killed a lot of people. And yeah, in this case it was a metric of success for him and his empire.
Re:My Venezuela Nightmare: A 30-Day Hunt for Food in a Starv...
by ktRolster on Monday July 18, 2016 @02:45PM
(#12117227)
I always find it strange that Genghis Khan is used as an example this way.
Mainly because he is seen as a barbarian conqueror, so people understand me if I use that phrase.
(whether he was or not is immaterial: though by modern standards, he was a barbarian conqueror and completely unethical)
Re:My Venezuela Nightmare: A 30-Day Hunt for Food in a Starv...
by astrodust on Monday July 18, 2016 @01:42PM
(#12116706)
He also murdered millions of peasants he saw no use for since rice farming was not on their list of priorities.
When conquering China it was often the case that academics were the first on the chopping block since they were presumably the ones most likely to cause trouble.
So yeah, he fixed the economy?