News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: Insider history of the demise of Kodak? by TorKlingberg on Monday July 18, 2016 @05:38AM (#12114044)
How is selling printers rent seeking?
Re:Ask HN: Insider history of the demise of Kodak? by mathgeek on Monday July 18, 2016 @08:37AM (#12114672)
Xerox derives much of its income from contracts rather than selling printers directly. They rent you the printer and charge you per page printed.

Source: worked tech support for better part of the 2000's and had to get Xerox printers on our networks often. Spent a lot of time updating settings when the contracts renewed and new printers were leased.

Re:Ask HN: Insider history of the demise of Kodak? by TorKlingberg on Monday July 18, 2016 @10:40AM (#12115281)
That sounds like something their customers want, whether you think they should or not.
Re:Ask HN: Insider history of the demise of Kodak? by mathgeek on Monday July 18, 2016 @02:51PM (#12117273)
That's essentially what I found in my time working with them. This was public sector so the idea of budgeting the hardware cost as a lease and paying per print really appealed to the administration.
Re:Ask HN: Insider history of the demise of Kodak? by dredmorbius on Monday July 18, 2016 @06:22AM (#12114186)
Possibly exploiting patents.Though Xerox lost out on much of that to IIRC Toshiba.