News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Reviews of neural network research papers for art generation by dzhiurgis on Thursday July 14, 2016 @06:42AM (#12092753)
I keep wondering, has anyone tried feeding all these papers about neural networks into the neural network and what would the outcome be?

Sort of like someone did with wikipedia, css, etc?

Re:Reviews of neural network research papers for art generation by daveguy on Thursday July 14, 2016 @09:20AM (#12093476)
> what would the outcome be?

Machine-learning sounding gibberish. Here is an example of sci-fi screenplay sounding gibberish (amusingly, directed, produced and acted by real people):

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11875829

Re:Reviews of neural network research papers for art generation by pamelabuck on Thursday July 14, 2016 @11:04AM (#12094440)
Anyone knows if there's actually a repo somewhere that captures what the title says?
Re:Reviews of neural network research papers for art generation by tongcx on Thursday July 14, 2016 @10:25AM (#12094039)
Could we include the deepmind atari paper there? Should be interesting to lots of people.
Re:Reviews of neural network research papers for art generation by nl on Thursday July 14, 2016 @06:43AM (#12092757)
Can re-title this? Perhaps Something like "Art Related Deep Learning Papers"?

This list is specific to those working in the context of deep-learning generated picture based artwork. It isn't a general list.

Re:Reviews of neural network research papers for art generation by bernardopires on Thursday July 14, 2016 @04:35AM (#12092409)
The title is a little misleading as the context here is art. This is not a general list of deep learning papers to read, but art-related deep learning papers to read. Google's project Magenta objective is to answer the question "can we use machine learning to create compelling art and music?"