Re:Reviews of neural network research papers for art generation
by daveguy on Thursday July 14, 2016 @09:20AM
(#12093476)
> what would the outcome be?
Machine-learning sounding gibberish. Here is an example of sci-fi screenplay sounding gibberish (amusingly, directed, produced and acted by real people):
Re:Reviews of neural network research papers for art generation
by bernardopires on Thursday July 14, 2016 @04:35AM
(#12092409)
The title is a little misleading as the context here is art. This is not a general list of deep learning papers to read, but art-related deep learning papers to read. Google's project Magenta objective is to answer the question "can we use machine learning to create compelling art and music?"
Sort of like someone did with wikipedia, css, etc?
Machine-learning sounding gibberish. Here is an example of sci-fi screenplay sounding gibberish (amusingly, directed, produced and acted by real people):
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11875829
This list is specific to those working in the context of deep-learning generated picture based artwork. It isn't a general list.