Actually the article in "the software vulnerabilities" is pretty useful, since he's referring to the specific vulnerabilities that let him in to the DNC. You could potentially gather that from context, but to my native ear the article sounds better.
The second example is, as you say, an obvious mistake.
It's impossible to tell if someone is genuinely making mistakes or simulating them, but just from a surface analysis:
I don't think a native speaker would ever say "I've already said about..." - you would say "I've already mentioned/written about/discussed". "Said about" is glaringly, obviously wrong.
In the second thing you cited, I could see that being a typo / editing mistake - could have meant to say "from the Marcel story" or "from Marcel's story" and it got mixed up in editing (e.g sometimes you write a sentence one way and then paste something in and don't re-read what you wrote). But if it was intentional then yes, it's definitely wrong.
His writing lacks the typical mistakes Eastern Europeans often make when writing English prose, namely omitting the indefinite article. If you look closely he might be overcompensating, for example:
I'm not a native English speaker myself but isn't the article superfluous here? The next one is more obvious: