News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Investing Returns on the S&P500 by nerfhammer on Wednesday June 29, 2016 @03:01PM (#12003826)
Tangent, but the US freight rail networks are much better than Europe. US is good at freight rail and bad at passenger service, Europe is vice versa.
Re:Investing Returns on the S&P500 by xiaoma on Wednesday June 29, 2016 @03:11PM (#12003933)
Actually, I find Europe's passenger service uninspiring compared to Japan or especially Taiwan.
Re:Investing Returns on the S&P500 by reddytowns on Wednesday June 29, 2016 @06:04PM (#12005159)
Taiwan's trains are subsidized
Re:Investing Returns on the S&P500 by xiaoma on Wednesday June 29, 2016 @06:32PM (#12005324)
So are Japan's. The idea isn't to get a profit off of tickets vs operating costs. The idea is to improve the efficiency of the country and economy. It's an investment.

If the US had a similar political climate the east coast would already have high speed rail from New York to Miami.

Re:Investing Returns on the S&P500 by nerfhammer on Wednesday June 29, 2016 @08:44PM (#12005901)
Rail needs to be profitable, but roads certainly don't. For some reason.
Re:Investing Returns on the S&P500 by reddytowns on Wednesday June 29, 2016 @11:29PM (#12006384)
Japan has a very low subsidy and most of its railways are private and receive none.
Re:Investing Returns on the S&P500 by knd775 on Thursday June 30, 2016 @11:20AM (#12009126)
I think that Japan's population density and relatively small size makes it much easier to make money on railways.
Re:Investing Returns on the S&P500 by fapjacks on Wednesday June 29, 2016 @06:10PM (#12005186)
But they don't need to be, really, when they can just put it on a boat for the whole journey, or most of the journey and then just truck it a few hours inland.